Search for: "Hughes v. State" Results 1281 - 1300 of 1,956
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2010, 6:44 am by James Bickford
  David Savage reports for the Los Angeles Times on Cullen v. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 7:01 am by John Elwood
Hughes, 17-467 Issues: (1) Whether the U.S. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 7:34 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
In my view, this opening phrase cannot be read as a direction to exclude contribution and indemnity claims from the operation of ss. 5(2) and 15, as was suggested in Hughes v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 9:02 am by Douglas Berman
The justices will arrive at this case immediately after hearing argument in another case questioning the meaning and application of the split 4-1-4 Freeman ruling, Hughes v. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 12:00 pm by Gary Corn, Melanie Teplinsky
Entitled “Combating Ransomware: One Year On,” the paper was drafted in consultation with leading experts in the field: V. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 1:34 pm
" That led the court to a consideration of prior English case law as well of that of other EPC member states. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 7:59 am
" That led the court to a consideration of prior English case law as well of that of other EPC member states. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:25 pm
U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, September 08, 2008 Hughes v. [read post]
29 Mar 2008, 3:07 pm
It assumes there is a "making available" right in the United States, which even the RIAA knows is not so -- as evidenced by its removal of that theory from its complaints once Judge Brewster held that its complaint fails to state a claim in Interscope v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 4:32 am
Yozmot 33 Limited (EPLAW)   United States US General Comcast owes P2P users $16; yes, they should take it (Ars Technica) Dow Jones files hot news misappropriation suit against Breifing.com (The Trademark Blog)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC affirms ITC’s findings that Global Locate has standing, SiRF directly infringes patents: SiRF v ITC (ITC 337 Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) District Court E D Texas: Challenge to plaintiff’s… [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 4:50 am
The Court held that as long as reasonable, non-discriminatory alternatives exist that serve the states legitimate interests, they must be used instead of a discriminatory ban.In Hughes v Oklahoma (1979), the Court invalidated an Oklahoma law prohibiting the interstate transportation of minnows taken from Oklahoma waters. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 9:46 am
Katfriend Nicoletta Epaminonda takes a loot at the Cypriot transposition of the Trade Mark Directive 2015/2436 and reflects on what the future might hold for trade marks in this Member State. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 4:52 am by William Ford
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit’s ruling in Davidson v. [read post]