Search for: "Hughes v. State"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 1,956
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2013, 2:15 pm
Hughes (argue)Insufficient evidence of alternative meansImproper admission of defendant's statementsState v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 9:01 am
IANAL, but my personal view was that SB 187 did not provide enough discretion on sentencing to comply with the Supreme Court's decision in Miller v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 9:01 pm
An arrest is a “seizure” for Fourth Amendment purposes, but under a case called United States v. [read post]
Bowman v Monsanto: the US Supreme Court rules on patent exhaustion and replication of patented seeds
14 May 2013, 2:09 pm
Yesterday, the Supreme Court of the United States delivered its long-awaited judgment in the case of Bowman v Monsanto Co. et Al., unanimously ruling that 'patent exhaustion does not permit a farmer to reproduce patented seeds through planting and harvesting without the patent holder's permission'. [read post]
6 May 2013, 7:44 am
The Hughes Court certainly seemed to head toward a general rule that states must make reasonable efforts to appoint (and thereby pay) counsel for the indigent.Yet, in Avery v. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
” In a case that came before the highest court in New York State in 1984, People v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 9:03 am
Prone to certification even after Wal-Mart v. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 11:37 am
This would create in state habeas law a remedy for lawyers' failure to advised their clients of collateral consequences, following a recent SCOTUS precedent on-point in Padilla v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 1:57 pm
On Tuesday in Tarrant Regional Water District v. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court decided Florida v. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 7:42 am
Bryan Hughes of Mineola and Democratic state Sen. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am
Neil Turner v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 12/04/2013; Ms Carina Trimingham v Daily Mirror, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Ms Carina Trimingham v Metro, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Bath & North East Somerset Council v The Times, Clause 5, 11/04/2013; Warren Hamilton Daily Mai, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Catherine Whiteside The Scottish Sun, Clauses 1, 5, 11/04/2013; Ms Lynne Hales v Daily Mail, Clause 6, 11/04/2013; Emilie Sandy v The Citizen (Gloucester) v… [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 12:33 pm
Elliott v. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 5:08 pm
” (Shaaban Bin Hussien v Chong Fook Kam [1970] AC 942, at 948). [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 7:26 pm
He described the circuit split leading to FTC v Actavis currently pending in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 3:55 pm
The Supreme Court again reversed the defendants’ convictions in Norris v Alabama. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 4:45 am
Hughes has done a terrific job of promoting the legislation across party lines..BTW, if your state rep is not on this list, then call them to ask them to become a co-author of HB 1608 (you can look up their contact info here.) [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 11:44 am
Hughes Aircraft Co., 57 Md. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
This is why, for example, testing a defendant’s white powder to see whether it is cocaine invades no reasonable expectation of privacy, under United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 5:06 pm
In English law the “conventional figures” are much higher than in, say, France but much lower than in the United States. [read post]
