Search for: "Idaho Supreme Court" Results 1281 - 1300 of 2,031
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2017, 1:51 pm by Eugene Volokh
The Supreme Court will likely confront that question in the Masterpiece Cakeshop case, as it has in the past in the private club cases (Roberts v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 8:37 pm by Josh Blackman
This message is directed right at the Supreme Court Justice with the most children–Justice Barrett. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 9:01 pm
Neither the United States Supreme Court nor Idaho appellate courts have spoken to this issue, nor have the vast majority of the federal circuit courts. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 12:48 pm by John Ross
Dissent: The Supreme Court created a test, which the majority didn't apply and under which the law fails. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 6:05 am
Ct., Jan. 14, 2009), the Vermont Supreme Court rejected a prisoner's claim that his free exercise rights were violated when he was ordered to submit a DNA sample for the state's DNA data base.In Iswed v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 6:38 am
Army Corps of Engineers, where the Federal District Court of Idaho held that the government cannot prohibit firearms in tents on government-owned recreation areas. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 12:16 pm by Nicholas Gebelt
Supreme Court handed down an opinion that shed light on the meaning of the word “defalcation” as it is used in the Bankruptcy Code’s list of nondischargeable debts. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
” Former President Trump asked the Supreme Court to review that decision, and this week, the Court agreed to do so. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 7:51 pm by Josh Blackman
First, Biskupic describes her sourcing this way: This exclusive series on the Supreme Court is based on CNN sources inside and outside the court with knowledge of the deliberations. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 11:47 am by Shea Denning
On the totality of the circumstances side, the Supreme Court of Hawaii in State v. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 11:47 am by Shea Denning
On the totality of the circumstances side, the Supreme Court of Hawaii in State v. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 8:30 am by Sandy Levinson
 Consider, e.g., Pennsylvania and North Carolina, whose current Republican majorities are the result of a thoroughly illegitimate (though, the Supreme Court has told us, constitutional) gerrymanders designed to minimize the actual ability of Democrats to elect their candidates. 4)  The House, as in 1801, conducts a number of ballots, since none of the three candidates, Trump, Clinton, or Romney/Ryan gets a majority of the state delegations. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 4:03 am by SHG
The concept was established by the Supreme Court in Bakke, that the value of a diverse student population was a legitimate interest of colleges, and that using race as a consideration atop the other considerations of student qualifications was not unlawful discrimination. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 6:42 am
Sentencing Law and Policy highlights this article in the Idaho Statesman on the local impact of the Court's 2002 decision in Ring v. [read post]