Search for: "In Re CAL"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 5,797
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2024, 4:58 am
Here is opinion in In re Dezi C. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 12:53 pm
” (In re Tobacco II Cases (2009) 46 Cal.4th 298, 315.) [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 11:06 am
Cal.). [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 4:26 am
In re P.A., 211 Cal. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 12:38 pm
Chief Justice Ronald George announced a week ago that he would not be seeking re-election this November (California Supreme Court justices stand for a yes or no re-election vote every twelve years). [read post]
FROM THE LEAVE-GUNS-TO-THE-PROFESSIONALS DEPARTMENT: Bethlehem Cop Blames Negligent Discharge on In…
19 Oct 2011, 10:29 am
As we’re fond of asking, what could possibly go wrong? [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 8:27 am
Decision TRO Re DMCA Second Life [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:50 pm
There is something for everyone in this decision, and counsel is urged to read and re-read this decision whenever a vocational expert is expected to be used in a case. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 11:07 am
You're going to get sentenced to death for that. [read post]
6 May 2014, 10:04 am
But, not surprisingly, we're pretty harsh on these sorts of things. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:21 pm
We're generally mellow folk. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 5:06 pm
You're going to be hard pressed to persuade someone that, at this point, taking a 28-year old off the street until he's 60 or so (assuming time off for good behavior) is unconstitutionally excessive.On an only tangentially related note, I had to reflect on my own mental competence when I stumbled over a portion of Justice Murray's opinion. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 1:42 pm
The other side files a motion, you oppose it, you conclude that there's absolutely no way you're going to lose the thing, and then lo and behold, the trial court grants the motion.Here's an example.Plaintiff files a putative class action that says that Newegg advertises "discounts" off of "regular" prices that are essentially fake. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 11:43 am
You're rarely able to look at what happens behind closed doors, in chambers, as the justices draft a published opinion. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 2:44 pm
But they're not "experts" on crime generally.And when the trial judge let's 'em testify too broadly, as here, we gotta throw out the conviction and do the whole thing all over again.Unfortunately. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 12:57 pm
We're talking a lot of work by everyone involved.Moreover, if you think the stock market is just a nice, easy place, and trading's pretty straightforward, and an individual investor really has all of the same advantages as an institutional insider, feel free to check out the first fifteen pages of that second opinion. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 2:05 pm
One for which we're not even approaching a solution.So we use potentially lengthy periods of incarceration. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 6:48 pm
"Wholly apart from the Court of Appeal's expressly laudatory statement about Judge Wiley ("the experienced and highly regarded trial judge"), the Court of Appeal also recognizes that the issue was a complex one and the procedural setting of the dispute far from ideal.In short, if you're a trial judge who's going to get reversed by the Court of Appeal, something like this is probably how you want it to happen. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 1:26 pm
That way we could all know they're good. [read post]
30 May 2014, 12:37 pm
After all, we're talking about whether his 2005 nonviolent conviction gets reduced from life. [read post]
