Search for: "In the Matter of Joseph"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 5,418
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2020, 1:30 pm
Under an expressive meaning approach, as Schragger thoughtfully explains here and elsewhere, “The only thing that matters is whether the government conveys a demeaning or denigrating message through its activities—for example, whether it conveys a message of exclusion to one religious group by celebrating another. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 11:55 am
Case Background In 1967, Joseph I. [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 2:46 pm
It is in times of crisis that leadership matters most. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 1:42 pm
Authors: Joseph C. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 6:33 am
It was the first case to assert ultimate Supreme Court authority over state courts in civil matters of federal law. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 10:00 pm
With regards to any delays in the matter, the court noted that the delays were attributable to the insured and not the carrier.As such, the carrier's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the bad faith claim was granted.Anyone wishing to review a copy of this decision may click this LINK.I send thanks to Attorney Joseph Hudock of the Pittsburgh law firm of Summers, McDonnell, Hudock, Guthrie and Rauch, P.C. for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 12:38 pm
Under the bill, public business conducted electronically should be limited to matters necessary for the continuing operation of government or related to the applicable declarations of emergency. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 12:17 am
It should hardly need saying that a sitting federal judge should not be in the business of advising prosecutors, even indirectly, about such matters. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 1:46 pm
As a preliminary matter, and before I get into breaking down what the opinion does and does not do, I want to note here that the use of FFPs was a solution proposed and advanced by Stanford Law School Professor Joseph Grundfest, to the point that this ideal was referred to by many as the “Grundfest solution. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 9:00 am
The couple, Joseph R. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 5:00 am
And these ideas matter. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 4:10 am
In Matter of Telano, Decision and Order [Sup Ct NY County Jan. 8, 2020], Manhattan Justice Joseph Risi tackled the interesting question of whether a shareholder petitioning for dissolution may sue a non-shareholder, director, or officer under the “surcharge” provision of section 1104-a(d) seeking in effect to use the statute as a substitute for an otherwise viable cause of action. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 6:50 am
Joseph Kim, asserting claims based on Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and on Rule 10b-5. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 8:02 am
And Patja Howell shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast featuring an interview with Joseph Nye, professor emeritus and former dean of the Harvard Kennedy School, on his recent book “Do Morals Matter? [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 9:03 pm
In his thoughtful response, Joseph Postell suggests we may have the implications of delegation’s timing dynamic backward. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 5:00 am
The appointment followed the dismissal of a different acting official, Joseph Maguire, who had been appointed as acting DNI on Aug. 16. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 12:35 pm
Jen Patja Howell shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast featuring an interview with Joseph Nye, professor emeritus and former dean of the Harvard Kennedy School, on his recent book “Do Morals Matter? [read post]
7 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
Do morals matter? [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 3:00 am
National/Federal Biden Claims 9 Super Tuesday Victories, Including Texas AP News – Steve Peoples and Will Weissert | Published: 3/4/2020 A resurgent Joe Biden scored victories from Texas to Massachusetts on Super Tuesday, revitalizing a presidential bid that was teetering on the edge of disaster just days earlier. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
One of Rick’s central claims is that rhetoric matters to voters; it matters to their subjective sense that the process is fair and it matters for their ability to accept outcomes that are inconsistent with their electoral preferences. [read post]
