Search for: "JORDAN v. JORDAN" Results 1281 - 1300 of 2,610
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2015, 7:00 am by Ruth Levush
However, in accordance with the case law of the ECHR, the EU Members must not transfer back refugees to the first country of entry, if the conditions in that country violate human rights standards, which amount to degrading treatment (See case of M.S.S. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 12:17 pm by Elina Saxena, Cody M. Poplin
Kerry will visit Amman to speak with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas and the Jordan’s King Abdullah II on Saturday. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 6:32 am by Joy Waltemath
Though the wife claimed none of the information sought was on her iPhone, the court was skeptical because the employer could not refute that absent a forensic exam, and spoliation had already become an issue in the case (Brown Jordan International, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 12:45 pm by EEM
V, no. 3 (July-Sept. 2015) [full-text via ReliefWeb]- The five articles in this issue focus "on the migration challenges facing the countries of the Middle East and North Africa (MENA). [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 6:01 am by Administrator
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 11:55 am
Fort Wayne, Indiana - An Indiana intellectual property attorney for Global Archery Products, Inc. of Ashley, Indiana commenced litigation in the Northern District of Indiana alleging trademark and patent infringement by Jordan Gwyther d/b/a Larping.org and UpshotArrows.com of Seattle, Washington. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 12:01 pm by Elina Saxena, Quinta Jurecic
” Desperate to flee terrible conditions in underfunded Jordanian refugee camps, many Syrian refugees in Jordan are now looking to head toward Europe or even back into their home country. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 1:06 pm
The federal district court’s decision last week (Issa v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 5:32 am
As Justice Mustang wrote for the Untied States Supreme Court in in the semenal 2010 case of Clouseau v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
He held that the less cogent the evidence needed to satisfy the standard, (see Callaghan v Independent News & Media Limited [2008] NIQB 15 at [17] which is an aspect of the precautionary principle see Jordan’s Applications [2014] NIQB 11 at [118])([35]). [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 1:02 pm
The case is Minder Music & Another v Sharples. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 1:47 am
 | Criminalisation of IP and economics | Keeping count of blocked websites in the UK |Birkin Bags | Patentability of user interface designs in Germany |Smith & Nephew v ConvaTec | Report on IPEC litigation |does Twitter have a future? [read post]