Search for: "Johnson v. United States Government" Results 1281 - 1300 of 2,043
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am by John Elwood
United States, 14-282, asking whether conspiracy to commit robbery is a violent felony justifying an enhanced sentence under the Armed Career Criminal Act, appears to be a hold for Johnson v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 3:12 pm
Chief Justice Marshall famously wrote that the United States has "a government of laws, and not of men. [read post]
17 May 2015, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
United States Florida: a former superintendent has had his lawsuit against the accounting firm Mauldin & Jenkins dismissed. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Two days later, the United States Supreme Court decided Roe v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
Surgidev Corp., 899 P.2d 576, 591 (N.M. 1995) (“evidence of compliance with FDA regulations was properly submitted to the jury for consideration”); United Blood Services v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 7:43 am by John Elwood
Of last week’s 16 relists, the court dumped nearly half, including United States Forest Service v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:43 am by Wessen Jazrawi
MGN Limited v. the United Kingdom – 39401/04 [2012] ECHR 993 (12 June 2012). [read post]
17 Mar 2018, 7:18 am by William Ford
  Andrew Grotto outlined six tools the United States can use to combat the national security risks of Kaspersky Labs’ software. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 7:36 am
This guide has been compiled by United Cerebral Palsy as a portion of their One-Stop Resource Guide. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Those arguments are more relevant, and far more prevalent, in non-drug/device cases where the presentation of warnings is not minutely governed by federal law, and unlike prescribing physicians, there are plaintiffs who can’t read English, who have to deal with warnings in workplace settings, or who are just plain knuckleheads in using products. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 8:17 am by Guest Author
In oral argument of the Citizens United case, Chief Justice Roberts noted: “[W]e don’t put our First Amendment rights in the hands of [government] bureaucrats. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 8:42 am by Amy Howe
The government asked the Supreme Court to weigh in on whether a final judgment in favor of the United States in a lawsuit brought under the FTCA, on the ground that a private individual could not be held liable in the same circumstances, bars a claim against a government employee based on Bivens v. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 6:55 am by Benjamin Bissell
Jane announced that the Fourth Circuit affirmed the 2012 refusal to vacate the sentence in the United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
United Illuminating, 1998 WL 910271, at *10 (Conn. [read post]