Search for: "London v. State"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 4,150
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2017, 7:12 am
London’s National Gallery Will Purchase Painting by Bellotto for Over £11m. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 7:12 am
London’s National Gallery Will Purchase Painting by Bellotto for Over £11m. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 12:20 am
Akpan v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 4:30 pm
The Brett Wilson Media Law blog has a post about the hack of the London Bridge Plastic Surgery by hackers calling themselves “The Dark Overlord”. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 1:02 am
ARLA state:- “In our response we are highlighting the ineffectiveness of legislation which fails to be supported by appropriate levels of enforcement. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 7:24 am
The reasoning in the decisions on the “expected ready” provision suggests that such an obligation probably does arise, and this view has been adopted by London arbitrators. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 5:31 pm
There have been reports of two new large scale data breaches this week – on the Bermuda based law firm, Appleby and on the London Bridge Plastic Surgery clinic. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 3:47 pm
That settled accommodation forms such a ‘break’ was held in Din v Wandsworth London Borough Council [1983] 1 AC 657, as approved by the House of Lords in R v London Borough of Brent ex parte Awua [1996] 1 AC 55. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 7:03 am
The judgment is clear that what is to be judged objectively is not the defendant’s actions but his subjective state of mind. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 2:53 am
It also considered the correct basis on which a court should exercise its discretion to make receivership orders, and the circumstances in which the State Immunity Act 1978, ss 13(2)(b), 14(2) and 14(4) allow immunity from execution. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 4:16 am
Mr Huda, who has practices in Jersey, Guernsey and Cornwall, issued proceedings in London for defamation and malicious falsehood, and obtained permission from a High Court Master to serve the papers in Jersey. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 4:18 pm
Panayiotou v London Borough of Waltham Forest (2017) EWCA Civ 1624 This is an important court of appeal decision on the meaning of ‘significantly’ in Lord Neuberger’s definition of vulnerability under s.189(1)(c) Housing Act 1996 in Hotak v Southwark LBC (2015) UKSC 30, [2016] AC 811 (our report). [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 4:16 pm
United States U.S. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 8:00 am
Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 8:00 am
Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 2:22 am
Written by Ekaterina Aristova, PhD in Law Candidate, University of Cambridge On 14 October 2017, the London’s Court of Appeal passed its long awaited decision in Lungowe v Vedanta confirming that foreign citizens can pursue in England legal claims against English-based multinationals for their overseas activities. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 4:08 pm
However, “respect” may be secured through various potential methods and the State is afforded a margin of appreciation. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 4:05 pm
On 11 October 2017 Karen Bradley, the Secretary of State for Digital [sic], Culture, Media and Sport gave evidence to House of Commons Committee which covers her department. [read post]
