Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 3,574
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2012, 3:06 am
In general, the Secretary of State reviewed a whole life tariff after 25 years’ imprisonment. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 3:33 am
Such forwarding would equate to copying the cuttings internally or externally for wider dissemination, which the House of Lords decided did require a separate licence in NLA v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 4:57 pm
In conjunction with the Locke Lord COVID-19 task force, we are reviewing, analyzing, and compiling regulatory updates to provide clients easy access to information during this unprecedented time. [read post]
4 May 2019, 12:39 pm
See Hay v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 4:01 pm
Last year, former Secretary of State for Justice Dominic Raab made changes to the Parole Board rules which prevented Prison and Probation staff from providing the Parole Board with recommendations regarding the release of imprisoned persons, However, it was held to be unlawful and reversed following its High Court challenge, R v Bailey. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 10:21 am
The appeals On this occasion, the three cases, to be heard over the four days, are all Scottish appeals: Monday 12 June, 11am – 4pmSadovska and another v Secretary of State for the Home Department This appeal relates to the evidential burden on the state when disrupting ‘sham marriages’. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 4:19 pm
Secondly, it claims, in effect, that the Master of the Rolls’ private researches demonstrates the law, as stated in the leading text book, to be not only wrong but unarguable. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 7:17 am
Lord Phillips MR, giving the judgment of the Court stated:- “We wish, however, to make some brief observations about [Lord Woolf CJ’s guidance in A v. [read post]
31 Aug 2008, 12:02 am
Government, with introductory note by Christina CernaHouse of Lords (on the Application of Al-Jedda) (FC) v. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 1:47 am
Lord Justice Richards went on to state that this applied even where the belief was unreasonably held. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 3:10 am
Lord Carnwarth gave the only judgment, with which the other Justices agreed. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 1:00 am
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 7:28 am
” This appears to be the first endorsement by an appellate court of the approach taken by Mr Justice Mitting on this issue in the case of TLT v (1) The Secretary of State for the Home Department and (2) The Home Office [2016] EWHC 2217. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 3:52 am
Lord Neuberger, giving the dissenting judgment, stated that the Court’s approach when reviewing this decision should be similar to that of an appellate court reviewing a trial judge’s decision. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 3:34 am
Lord Reed stated on behalf of all the justices that the starting point for the contractual interpretation is the words the parties used in condition 11.9(a). [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 10:52 am
See also, in the landlord and tenant context, Chandless-Chandless v Nicholson (1942) 2 KB 321, 323 per Lord Greene MR. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 7:22 am
Assocs., 182 N.J. 210, 225 (2005) (quoting 23 Williston on Contracts § 63:22, at 513-14 (Lord ed. 2002)). [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 8:53 am
Yes the Secretary of State has a power to include other forms of ill-treatment falling short of actual violence within s 177(1), but that had not been done because the SoS already believed that the word bore that wider meaning. [read post]
22 May 2017, 1:00 am
R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor, heard 27-28 Mar 2017. [read post]
15 May 2012, 7:48 am
On 25 April 2012 the Supreme Court handed down two major judgments on age discrimination: Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [2012] UKSC 15 and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes [2012] UKSC 16. [read post]
