Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 4,049
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2017, 3:41 pm
The vote in Wollschlaeger v. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 6:21 am
The case is Tartan Army Ltd v Sett GmbH and Others [2017] CSOH 22. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 4:09 pm
In Other Transparency News Press Regulation The Press Gazette reported Fresh Lords amendment keeps up pressure on Government to enact Section 40 costs provisions. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 7:04 am
(The House of Lords has had cause to address earlier iterations of this offence, but through the prism of whether the local authority had complied with its duty to arrange suitable transport to school where necessary: see, for example, Devon CC v George [1989] AC 573.) [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 1:00 am
The hand down panel will be Lord Mance, Lord Carnwath and Lord Toulson. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 8:00 am
In Mannarino v. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 4:36 pm
Reports stating that the case had concluded therefore appeared, naming the parties and myself. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 5:37 am
Oh, lord no. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 8:22 am
She also noted [at 50] that in Comic Enterprises Ltd v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 6:30 am
Lastly, Lord Justice Clark dismissed Popplewell J’s third reason above by stating “I do not regard the validity of my interpretation to be impugned because there is an element of tautology” and “I do not regard his erratic use of the comma as any real guide to meaning. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 1:00 am
The hand down panel will be Lady Hale, Lord Kerr and Lord Wilson. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 4:04 pm
Data Protection and Data Privacy The Hunton & Williams blog reports that on 1 February 2017, the UK Minister responsible for data protection gave evidence to a House of Lords Committee about the Government’s position on the GDPR. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 1:00 am
The hand down panel will be Lord Mance, Lord Kerr and Lord Hughes. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:08 pm
As already mentioned, on 24, 25 and 26 January 2017, the Supreme Court (Lords Neuberger, Mance, Sumption, Hughes and Hodge) heard the joined appeals in the cases of Flood v Times Newspapers, Miller v Associated Newspapers and Frost v MGN. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 2:14 pm
The question, in large part, was the significance of Lord Neuberger’s judgment in Hotak v Southwark London Borough Council; Kanu v Southwark London Borough Council [2016] AC 811, at paras 78 and 79 “78. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm
The Trump Court may undo this, and overrule the gay marriage case (Obergefell v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:25 am
The biggest legal story of this coming week will be the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union – the Article 50 “Brexit” judgment. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 7:28 am
In brief, the case of R v Egan [1992] 4 All ER 470 had stated (without the court having heard full argument) that the previous case of R v Lloyd [1967] 1 QB 175 legitimised two approaches to defining ‘substantial’ in the context of diminished responsibility. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 3:29 am
The Supreme Court’s decision The lead judgment, with whom the other Lords agreed, was given by Lord Mance. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 2:35 am
According to Lord Neuberger these are qualified by a public policy exception. [read post]
