Search for: "MATTER OF C B J B"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 3,062
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2017, 1:00 am
This case considered whether the Court of Appeal was correct to hold that the appellants’ arrests and detention were lawful under ECHR, art 5(1)(c) or alternatively under art 5(1)(b). [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 6:04 pm
Ct. 2128, 2139 (2015) (Kennedy, J., concurring in judgment); id. at 2142 (Breyer, J., dissenting); Kleindienst v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 1:16 pm
P. 56(c). [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 1:00 am
Newbigin v SJ & J Monk, heard 7 November 2016. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 4:06 pm
Advise the debtor of the requirement to complete an instructional course in personal financial management and the consequences of not doing so; J. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 4:06 pm
Advise the debtor of the requirement to complete an instructional course in personal financial management and the consequences of not doing so; J. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 3:57 am
The Memorandum provides concrete examples a), b) and c) showing how priority has to be assessed. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 12:27 pm
Professor BlomqvistThe 1709 Blog has just received the following commentary by Professor Jørgen Blomqvist (University of Copenhagen) on a draft piece of EU legislation that requires no introduction – the proposed Directive on copyright in the Digital Single Market – and, more specifically, its provisions on out-of-commerce works.Here’s the thoughtful analysis by Professor Blomqvist:“The proposed European Directive on copyright in the Digital Single… [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 1:00 am
Newbigin v SJ & J Monk, heard 7 November 2016. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 5:12 pm
B. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:00 am
Newbigin v SJ & J Monk, heard 7 November 2016. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 4:11 pm
The court held that liability could only have arisen on the basis of the matters identified by Stephens J (see above) if Facebook was subject to a monitoring obligation, which is not permitted under the e-Commerce Directive. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 8:08 am
J. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 1:00 am
In the Matter of EV (a child) (Scotland); In the Matter of EV (a child) No.2 (Scotland), heard 12 January 2017. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 1:00 am
Warby J should have decisively rejected the submission base [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 7:27 am
Perales 75 B. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 6:53 am
’ Point C describes recognised self-regulation under Royal Charter, as offered for example by Impress. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 1:15 am
Pursuant to Rule 99 EPC the notice of appeal has to contain the name and the address of the appellant (Rule 99(1)(a) EPC), an indication of the decision impugned (Rule 99(1)(b) EPC) and a request defining the subject of the appeal (Rule 99(1)(c) EPC). [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 12:30 am
Newbigin v SJ & J Monk, heard 7 November 2016. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am
Mitchell, 15-P-858 (Rule 1:28 Decision) (Jul. 5, 2016) vacated the trial court’s anti-SLAPP fees order and remanded the matter to the trial court to try again. [read post]
