Search for: "MATTER OF H C R"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 1,509
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am
SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTIONIV. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
Kerry Secretary of State 2201 C Street, NW Washington, DC 20520 cc: Honorable Roberta S. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
Lauderdale Division.Civil procedure -- Default -- Vacation -- Excusable neglect -- In action for breach of contract, open account and unjust enrichment in which default had been entered for defendants' failure to file answer to original complaint, where trial court first granted defendants' motion for vacation of default judgment on grounds of lack of subject matter jurisdiction based on forum selection clause, then upon plantiff's motion for rehearing determined it did have… [read post]
10 May 2012, 4:12 am
McDonnell (R) signed Wednesday, is unconstitutional. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 5:31 am
However, in her reply brief, with one sentence, she argues that "[c]learly there was serious artistic value. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 6:00 am
For the Balkinization Symposium on Alison L. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 4:54 pm
” Analysis and suggestions: While the first sentence of the foregoing proposed addition is helpful, the second sentence (and the rest of the proposed revisions to the section, for that matter) are unnecessary, premature, carry the potential for confusion and conflict with forthcoming California Supreme Court precedent on the subject, and should therefore probably be eliminated. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 11:55 am
”[4] This legislation provides: (b) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, and except as provided in subsection (c) of this Code section, an individual shall have the right to be treated for any illness or disease which is potentially life threatening or chronically disabling by a person licensed to practice medicine under this article with any experimental or nonconventional medical treatment that such individual desires or the legal representative of such individual… [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2015) Professor James Stewart, of the Faculty of Law at the University of British Columbia, has produced a valuable on line symposium: Business and Human Rights: Next Steps. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 5:10 pm
Most proxy access bylaws address, in some form, the following issues: (a) ownership threshold, (b) length of ownership, (c) maximum number of stockholder nominated candidates, (d) calculation of qualifying ownership, including treatment of “loaned” shares, (e) stockholder group limit, (f) maximum number of access nominees, (g) notice deadlines, (h) future disqualification of stockholder nominees, (i) voting commitments, and (j) third-party compensation… [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
The worst-case scenario, insisted upon by right-wing critics, is that the Obama Administration ordered its minions to harass extreme conservative groups by delaying their applications to qualify as “501(c)(4) organizations. [read post]
26 May 2015, 9:00 pm
On May 20, Professor Michael C. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 6:20 pm
As a matter of first impression for our Circuit, we hold that the legislative invocation at issue constitutes government speech. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 1:45 pm
And, in the end, it seems that whatever leniency ends up being applied will be supplied via court decisions, with reasoning based on much the same language that has appeared here before.Following down the page, there is a smart grammatical change at 2(c) as well as the deletion of the requirement to immediately terminate terminated employees’ access to protected records at 2(e). [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Hasbrouck, Ernesto R. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Hasbrouck, Ernesto R. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 9:06 am
KK, Sec. 102(a)(2) (cited as SEC. 18D(c)). [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 8:02 am
The Trustee shall be entitled to extra compensation for these services commensurate with the time devoted to and the responsibility involved in the continuance and operation or sale of such business; C. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
City of Los Angeles (2007) 153 Cal.App.4th 1385), or is the agency’s decision subject to a threshold determination whether the modification of the project constitutes a “new project altogether,” as a matter of law (Save Our Neighborhood v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 am
(Patenthink) Patents likely matter little to US innovation and job creation (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Construing the ‘function’ of a means-plus-function claim element Baran v. [read post]
