Search for: "MATTER OF J C B" Results 1281 - 1300 of 3,065
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
In the Matter of EV (a child) (Scotland); In the Matter of EV (a child) No.2 (Scotland), heard 12 January 2017. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
The court then noted that the taxpayer’s narrow focus on this aspect of exhibit J gave no effect to the cross-references in Exhibits B and J. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
This case considered whether the Court of Appeal was correct to hold that the appellants’ arrests and detention were lawful under ECHR, art 5(1)(c) or alternatively under art 5(1)(b). [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 6:04 pm by Edward A. Fallone
Ct. 2128, 2139 (2015) (Kennedy, J., concurring in judgment); id. at 2142 (Breyer, J., dissenting); Kleindienst v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 4:06 pm by DaveKelly
Advise the debtor of the requirement to complete an instructional course in personal financial management and the consequences of not doing so; J. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 4:06 pm by DaveKelly
Advise the debtor of the requirement to complete an instructional course in personal financial management and the consequences of not doing so; J. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 3:57 am by Roel van Woudenberg
The Memorandum provides concrete examples a), b) and c) showing how priority has to be assessed. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 12:27 pm by Eleonora Rosati
Professor BlomqvistThe 1709 Blog has just received the following commentary by Professor Jørgen Blomqvist (University of Copenhagen) on a draft piece of EU legislation that requires no introduction – the proposed Directive on copyright in the Digital Single Market – and, more specifically, its provisions on out-of-commerce works.Here’s the thoughtful analysis by Professor Blomqvist:“The proposed European Directive on copyright in the Digital Single… [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
The court held that liability could only have arisen on the basis of the matters identified by Stephens J (see above) if Facebook was subject to a monitoring obligation, which is not permitted under the e-Commerce Directive. [read post]