Search for: "Marks v. United States"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 9,179
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2017, 2:32 pm
United States and Printz v. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 6:52 am
In 2022, the top five states with the highest number of bankruptcy petitions made up 31% of all filings in the United States.The following states reported the most number of bankruptcies declared in 2022. [read post]
20 Aug 2022, 12:54 pm
United Airlines. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 11:27 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit continued its recent scrutiny of the practices of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board in a non-precedential opinion issued November 22, 2023, regarding American Marriage Ministries’ challenge to the Universal Life Church’s “GET ORDAINED” trademark application based upon the alleged lack of distinctiveness and possibly failure to function as a mark for both classes of recited services. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 7:45 pm
(v) Whether the user of the mark or trade name intended to create an association with the famous mark. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 9:05 pm
Adams, plaintiff brought suit in 2005 against defendant Mary Noel Adams stemming from defendant’s use of the trademark PHASE FORWARD.After the Trademark Dilution Revision Act was enacted in October 2006, defendant moved for summary judgment on the ground that plaintiff’s mark did not meet the amended definition of a “famous mark” as one “widely recognized by the general consuming public of the United… [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
The Supreme Court [of the United States] subsequently rejected such inferences as incompatible with ordinary contract principles under federal law in M and G Polymers USA, LLC v Tackett (574 US 427 [2015]) and CNH Industrial N.V. v Reese (583 US 138 S Ct 761 [2018]), repudiating International Union, United Auto., Aerospace, and Agric. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
The Supreme Court [of the United States] subsequently rejected such inferences as incompatible with ordinary contract principles under federal law in M and G Polymers USA, LLC v Tackett (574 US 427 [2015]) and CNH Industrial N.V. v Reese (583 US 138 S Ct 761 [2018]), repudiating International Union, United Auto., Aerospace, and Agric. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 6:45 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 7:34 am
“The doctrine applies to violations of the United States Constitution and to violation of federal statutes. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 2:58 am
United States Postal Service v. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 3:26 am
The United States District Court for the District of Oregon reversed the Board's decision dismissing an opposition to registration of the mark MANIMAL for a wide variety of clothing, including "children’s clothing. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 4:05 am
As to actual confusion, since Shanghai has not exported any massage apparatus to the United States, "there has been no opportunity for actual, or potential, confusion to occur. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 7:33 am
Moreover, there is no evidence that any United States marks come as close to VOGUE as Applicant’s EVOGUE mark. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 4:26 am
Trospium chloride, made by Madaus, was sold as "Céris" in France, as "uriVesc" in Germany and as “Regurin” in the United Kingdom -- where Madaus owned the United Kingdom trade mark REGURIN for pharmaceutical preparations etc in Class 5. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 12:47 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 6:22 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 5:42 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 9:07 pm
First, Smiley alleges that these Counts present no case or controversy as required by the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C § 2201, and Article III, Section 2 of the United States Constitution. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 6:32 am
June 22 marked 50 days of an ongoing state-wide internet shutdown in the Northeastern state of Manipur in India. [read post]
