Search for: "Marks v. United States Department of Justice"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 1,626
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2011, 1:14 am
(Michael Geist) Election 2011: Party platforms on digital issues (IP Osgoode) Software licensing in the Cloud article (IPblog) Tasini takes on Huffington Post over compensation for blog posts (IP Osgoode) China Media piracy in Emerging Economy Report: Omnipresent China conspicuously absent (IP Dragon) Shake or crush your hand: Huawei versus ZTE versus Huawei (IP Dragon) (China Hearsay) Europe EU announces €600M Euro plan for ‘Internet of the Future’ (IAM) More on Google’s… [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 3:31 am
DRC, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 7:08 am
United States. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 5:31 am
Mark Warner (D-Va.) and Sen. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 5:01 am
The case is cited in all three reports issued by the committee in support of finding recalcitrant witnesses—Trump associate Steve Bannon, former Trump Chief of Staff Mark Meadows and former Justice Department official Jeffrey Clark—in contempt of Congress. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 9:11 am
Stanley Fish This brief essay was delivered as a response to a paper co-written by Justice Thomas R. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 9:11 am
Stanley Fish This brief essay was delivered as a response to a paper co-written by Justice Thomas R. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm
Justice Clarence Thomas, however, argued in his concurrence that the Court should reconsider longstanding substantive due process rulings, including Griswold v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 5:01 am
For example, in a 2000 opinion by the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) justifying military intervention in Kosovo, the executive branch asserted that “where the President has requested an appropriation in order to continue military operations, evidence showing that Members of Congress were specifically aware of the purposes of the appropriation request will tend to show that Congress intended to authorize continuing military operations[.] [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 10:43 am
Supreme Court decided Missouri v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 4:26 am
Secretary of State Antony Blinken has told his Ukrainian counterpart that this progress — marked by Kyiv Embassy charge d’affaires Kristina Kvien’s visit yesterday to commemorate V-E Day — is a testament to Ukraine’s success and Moscow’s failure in the early phase of the war. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 4:54 pm
In determining the applicability of the Due Process Clause, the United States Supreme Court first asks whether the asserted individual interests are encompassed within the Fourteenth Amendment's protection of life, liberty or property. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 12:05 am
Iglesias, who was asked to resign from the Justice Department with at least six other U.S. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:01 am
In the United States, legal limits on prisoner isolation are largely the product of litigation, whereas the Canadian scheme arrived through legislation. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 5:54 am
Department of Justice. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 8:36 am
Last month, the military commission for the matter of United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:41 am
Maloney (September 30, 2022) Department of Justice, Detailed Inventory of August 8, 2022 search Department of Justice, Revised Detailed Inventory (Sept. 26, 2022) Department of Justice, Privilege Review Team Inventory (filed [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 4:29 pm
United States Stanford’s Cyberlaw Blog has considered how the FTC can help safeguard privacy rights with legislative mandates from Congress. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 7:53 am
In the United States, a company can resolve an FCPA case through a DPA. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm
“Office of the White House Counsel” in Mark Green and Michele Jolin, eds. [read post]
