Search for: "Matter of Wright"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 2,152
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2013, 12:31 pm
Copyright (and patent!) [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 3:43 pm
Here's what they all say: Plaintiff hereby notifies the Court of allegations of forgery that were made during a hearing in a matter pending before the U.S. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
Now that the 2012 election is in the rear-view mirror and the 2016 election is still somewhat distant on the horizon, this is an appropriate time to return to the question of presidential election reform. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 11:59 am
I CAN ASSURE YOU THAT JUST IGNORING LEGAL MATTERS, IT'S NOT GOING TO GO AWAY. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 8:00 pm
Wright began by establishing who was present. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 10:13 pm
Pietz has thoughtfully filed the depositions here in the case before Judge Wright for the judge's review before next Monday. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 10:44 am
And given the subject matter of Ingenuity 13’s accusations and the economics of defending such a lawsuit, it is highly likely that the subscriber would immediately pay a settlement demand—regardless whether the subscriber is the actual infringer. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court this week handed down its first (but almost certainly not its last) 5-4 ruling of the Term. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
The second distinction—the need for both Houses of Congress, and not just one, to be involved before legislative standing is allowed—does draw support from the facts of Chadha (and those of Karcher, for that matter, where the leaders of both chambers of the New Jersey legislature intervened to defend), and also from the fact that Article I of the U.S. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 1:48 pm
Predictions are pretty silly, but here's mine: The Law Court reverses Mills, finding that the issue of privacy is a matter of fact to be determined by the jury. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 9:30 pm
Seems like that matters. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm
He did not, however, accept the argument that the claim should be struck out because the institution is prevented from bringing a defamation action: “In this jurisdiction, if it were decided that as a matter of public policy universities should not have the right to sue for libel, that could only be implemented by the legislature or, perhaps, by the Supreme Court“. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 1:54 pm
Wright Mills, Fromm “remains a model for those who wish to become public and political intellectuals,” even if his impact on the New Left, and in particular the Students for a Democratic Society (SDS), was nowhere near that of Mills nor, for that matter, his Freudo-Marxist sparring partner, Herbert Marcuse. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 11:32 am
Wright’s direct inquiry in 2007. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
In my column today, I explore what might be learned from the decision by the House of Representatives last week and the seemingly imminent (as of this writing) decision of the Senate this week to pass a bill that seems on its face to directly violate the clear text of the Constitution. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 7:59 am
In the recent case (Wright v. [read post]
26 Jan 2013, 8:43 am
January 26, 2013 Steve Szentesi Kevin Wright (Davis LLP) (with contributions by Jonathan Gilhen – Davis LLP) Extract from a chapter to be published in CLEBC’s Annual Review of Law & Practice – 2013 ____________________ 2012 was a busy year for Canadian competition and foreign investment law, with significant developments in all major areas including misleading advertising, mergers, abuse of dominance, criminal matters (including cartels, bid-rigging and… [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 11:22 am
The matter is remanded for the trial court to conduct the remaining voir dire in a presumptively public manner, exercising its considerable discretion to prevent the dissemination of sensitive juror information. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 6:50 am
January 25, 2013 Steve Szentesi Kevin Wright (Davis LLP) (with contributions by Jonathan Gilhen – Davis LLP) Extract from a chapter to be published in CLEBC’s Annual Review of Law & Practice – 2013 ____________________ 2012 was a busy year for Canadian competition and foreign investment law, with significant developments in all major areas including misleading advertising, mergers, abuse of dominance, criminal matters (including cartels, bid-rigging and… [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:02 am
January 24, 2013 Steve Szentesi Kevin Wright (Davis LLP) (with contributions by Jonathan Gilhen – Davis LLP) Extract from a chapter to be published in CLEBC’s Annual Review of Law & Practice – 2013 ____________________ 2012 was a busy year for Canadian competition and foreign investment law, with significant developments in all major areas including misleading advertising, mergers, abuse of dominance, criminal matters (including cartels, bid-rigging and… [read post]
