Search for: "One Step Up Ltd."
Results 1281 - 1300
of 1,511
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jul 2010, 6:02 pm
(Public Knowledge) Michael Geist presentation: ACTA – The state of play (Michael Geist) Australia I thought cats were colour blind… Federal Court confirms Mars has exclusive right to use colour ‘Whiskas purple’ for cat food: Mars Australia Pty Ltd (formerly Effem Foods Pty Ltd) v Société des Produits Nestlé SA (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) FCAFC: On appeal, simulated flames from direct light found infringing: Bitech… [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
Farley & Others (IP Whiteboard) Something to chew on: the Food Channel trade mark cases: Food Channel Network Pty Ltd v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm
Farley & Others (IP Whiteboard) Something to chew on: the Food Channel trade mark cases: Food Channel Network Pty Ltd v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 7:45 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger responds with enthusiasm to the Court’s decision to “clean up one of the messier areas of its jurisprudence” in taking up the case, and he expresses hope that the Court will rule “broadly and correctly,” in his view, to narrow and to simplify the litigation process. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 2:55 am
This weekend has seen yet more revelations of affairs in the tabloid newspapers, the most prominent being the coverage of the break up of the marriage of Lib-Dem cabinet minister, Chris Huhne. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 2:30 am
Submit this to Twittley Buzz up! [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 12:14 pm
One of the latest is the unpublished opinion in Sterio v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 3:39 pm
Held: The measured duty of care must be based on what steps it is reasonable to take for one landowner to prevent damage to the land of another from a hazard on their land, in the particular circumstances. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 3:39 pm
Held: The measured duty of care must be based on what steps it is reasonable to take for one landowner to prevent damage to the land of another from a hazard on their land, in the particular circumstances. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 2:47 pm
The first step in the chain is the designated national authority (DNA), which in India’s case is the ministry of environment and forests. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:36 am
When you read the case, you are reminded of the gigantic amount that a debtor is required to pay into a Chapter 13 for three to five years.The fact that a good opinion merely meant that debtors get to offer up their actual, factual income, rather than income that doesn't exist, is cause for celebration. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:56 am
: Football Dataco Ltd v Brittens Pools Ltd (IP Whiteboard) Full speed ahead for fast-track patents (IPKat) (Managing IP) UK implements ECJ's decision in favour of L'Oreal – L’Oreal v Bellure (Spicy IP) (IP Osgoode) Formula One, Chess and IP – Force India sues Lotus Racing for infringement of rights in VJM03 wind tunnel model (Spicy IP) When all design rights have expired, passing off remains: Numatic International Ltd v Qualtex UK… [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 12:52 am
Qualtex, one of the UK's less successful IP litigants in recent years (see here and here), must have had the smile wiped from their own faces when they lost again -- this time in Numatic International Ltd v Qualtex UK Ltd [2010] EWHC 1237 (C), a Chancery Division ruling from Mr Justice Floyd on 28 May.In this action Numatic sued Qualtex for passing off. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
M/s Godrej Sara Lee Ltd. v. [read post]
31 May 2010, 5:09 am
Piresferreira took a step backward and balanced herself against a filing cabinet. [read post]
22 May 2010, 6:12 am
One suspects the Court of Appeal may get the case they were apparently asking for before too long. [read post]
22 May 2010, 6:12 am
One suspects the Court of Appeal may get the case they were apparently asking for before too long. [read post]
18 May 2010, 2:02 pm
Trevor Faure is General Counsel for Ernst & Young Global Ltd. [read post]
18 May 2010, 6:56 am
WEILER: The next step after that13 is, since we know that they're getting better14 treatment -- the test ends up becoming a balancing15 requirement -- or you can call it balancing16 proportionality, you can call it a rule of reason,17 whatever language you want to use -- we see it in18 constitutional law and we see it in trade law, we19 see it in many places. [read post]
15 May 2010, 2:03 pm
If there’s one case we should all be keeping an eye on, it’s the one Greenberg is facing from 2,000 investors who claim to have lost $900 million in a Ponzi scheme allegedly run by Mortgages, Ltd. [read post]
