Search for: "P V Holding Corporation"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 1,781
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2011, 7:51 am
The decision reverses a narrow holding by the Seventh Circuit U.S. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 4:28 am
In Overton v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:52 am
[vi] If an individual is going to err deciding the layoff rights of an employee, it is likely to involve some confusion of status involving the three “P” words: permanent, probationer and provisional. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 6:15 pm
Heathcote Holdings Corp. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 8:56 pm
Scully v. [read post]
12 Mar 2011, 8:51 am
Applying a three-factor test for determining whether a corporation holds a document, the Court held that the software was a record of the business and not of the individual defendants. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 2:39 pm
P'ship, 131 S. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 10:08 am
Justice RaveendranThe Supreme Court in Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 9:49 am
(see p. 269)29. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 4:22 am
The Quebec Court of Appeal has ruled that Superior Court Justice Claude Larouche must recuse himself from the ongoing defamation case that Pierre Karl Péladeau, head of Quebecor media empire, has against Sylvain Lafrance, vice-president of Radio-Canada, the French-language service of the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 3:15 pm
By Daniel RichardsonArnold v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 3:47 pm
Loser Microsoft (v. i4i) has that going for invalidity all the way to the Supreme Court, which always toadies to power, governmental or corporate. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 8:23 am
n v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 7:16 pm
Max Sanders v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:41 am
SIPSKI, RONALD P. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:00 am
Ideal Food Stores, 494 P.2d 1063 (Kan. 1972); Grist v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 2:50 pm
Precon Development Corporation, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 6:45 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm
(Professor Brown notes the English Court of Appeal admitted this in Loutchansky v Times Newspapers Ltd (Nos 2 – 5) [2002] 2 WLR 640 at 653.) [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 3:56 pm
” The classic case is Lovenheim v. [read post]
