Search for: "Parker v Parker" Results 1281 - 1300 of 2,343
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2009, 12:07 pm
The answer to that question of first impression, in the case of Carolina Power & Light Company v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 7:46 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
" The Court of Appeals allows his case to proceed.The case is McGarry v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 10:01 am
In the 7-4 decision, the Court of Appeals cites executive authority and national security concerns in declining to extend Bivens liability in this context.The case is Arar v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Google also submitted that the Judge was bound by a decision of Kenneth Parker J in R( British Telecommunications) v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 2:31 pm by Robert Liles
The OPM Debarment Process – Responding to an FEHBP Debarment or Suspension Action in 2024 (December 20, 2023):  Most health care providers and suppliers are familiar with the fact that as a participating provider in the Medicare and / or Medicaid programs, certain criminal convictions, adverse licensure actions, and various types of prohibited conduct may subject the provider to exclusion from participation in Federal health care programs[1] by the… [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 3:43 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa. v Christopher Assoc., 257 AD2d 1, 12 [1st Dept 1999]). [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 4:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa. v Christopher Assoc., 257 AD2d 1, 12 [1st Dept 1999]). [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 6:14 am
After passing apartment complex after apartment complex with threatening signs to sports fans seeking to park, and other businesses who haven't figured out that you can license your precious, empty parking spaces to temporary parkers for a pretty penny, I located a spot in a sketchy part of a Mission Valley residential neighborhood. [read post]
18 Dec 2024, 4:01 am by Charles Sartain
The question in Rock River Minerals, LP and Carr v. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2024, 1:17 pm by The Clinton Law Firm
The key paragraph of this opinion is quoted below: Here, plaintiff’s allegation that Bellinson’s advice denied him the full value of his malpractice suit against Pepperman was “purely conclusory” (Murray Hill Invs. v Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl, LLP, 305 AD2d 228, 229 [1st Dept 2003]). [read post]