Search for: "People v Goode"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 22,562
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Fisher v. University of Texas, Justice Kennedy, and the Text and History of the Fourteenth Amendment
28 Feb 2012, 1:40 pm
” In 2007, in Parents Involved v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 8:07 am
That’s good news if you believe in comparatively easy access to the courts for prisoners. [read post]
3 May 2012, 6:36 am
The Court of Appeals today, in People v Liden (#67) determined that an Article 78 proceeding is not the only valid way to challenge a determination by the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders that he must register as a sex offender.Ordinarily such a determination is a simple matter of reading the statute. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 9:04 pm
Of all people to stalk, the police? [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 10:32 am
When explaining the legal rule in a brief, it's often tempting for law students and lawyers to give a good deal of historical background, something like this: In 1964, in New York Times v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 11:30 pm
That being said, we wish her good luck. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 8:00 pm
Not good. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 2:48 pm
(Veera v. [read post]
13 May 2023, 7:30 am
v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 5:24 am
The underlying case, Husain v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 5:58 am
" In Erving v. [read post]
25 May 2021, 10:46 am
” Implications Section 230 and People Search. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 4:30 pm
It's good, though a bit slow paced, a bit Merchant Ivory-like--a visual aid best enjoyed by people who already knew the novel.But it did remind us how much we enjoyed the novel (along with its companion piece, Black Mischief). [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 1:34 pm
Airways, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 9:22 am
Not good if true. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 4:01 pm
You may recall, as Blawgletter fondly does, a Simpsons episode featuring a monorail that an itinerant huckster -- Lyle Lanley -- convinced the good people of Springfield to buy for $3 million. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 11:13 am
Portman Says SESTA Doesn’t Affect the Good Samaritan Defense. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 2:55 am
""The individual may not have a right to get killed, because the state's interest in protecting people from coercion and abuse is a good one. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 9:18 am
See, e.g., Banaian v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 1:46 am
The morning the ECJ delivered its judgment in L'Oreal v Bellure, on whether 'knock off' imitation perfumes which clearly weren't the trade marked goods, but were marketed in a way that 'winked at' L'Oreal's famous perfume brands, infringed L'Oreal's trade marks and were protected as permissible comparative advertising.Is harm needed for unfair advantage? [read post]
