Search for: "People v Justice A."
Results 1281 - 1300
of 22,965
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2019, 4:44 pm
The South African High Court judgment in the case of amaBhungane Centre for Investigative Journalism v Minister of Justice and Correctional Services [2019] ZAGPPHC 384 is a victory for privacy rights. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Bostock was not a one-off for Justice Gorsuch with regard to federal protections for LGBT people. [read post]
1 Nov 2015, 2:39 pm
And he invokes the legendary Chief Justice John Marshall and the seminal nineteenth-century case of Marbury v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 6:55 am
The Michigan Supreme Court granted defendant-appellee’s motion for an extension to file his brief in People v Bailey. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 8:55 am
Some, like Justice Scalia for the Court in District of Columbia v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 12:23 pm
As Superior Court Justice Hill wrote in R. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 11:04 am
He owes it to the American people to provide an inkling of what kind of justice he would be. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 7:30 am
Supreme Court decisions, Kisela v. [read post]
25 Jan 2025, 9:53 pm
DeJoy and Kennedy v. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 1:10 pm
Bonta (consolidated with Thomas More Law Center v. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 2:13 am
Here's what prompted his latest foray into the criminal justice system. [read post]
31 May 2022, 2:44 pm
Social media platforms have transformed the way people communicate with each other and obtain news. [read post]
Police stop for being parked in a “high crime area” is a prima facie violation of Racial Justice Act
31 Aug 2023, 7:11 pm
DEMOND FINLEY, Petitioner, v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 6:33 am
Baze v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 3:35 pm
In guest post for ACSblog, Christina Swarns and Eva Paterson examine the criminal justice system’s pervasive racial disparities, which were significantly made worse by the infamous Supreme Court opinion in McCleskey v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 10:36 am
S. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 7:55 am
This article is the first entry in a symposium previewing Trump v. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 4:03 pm
Which is a classic example of a judge being bound by precedent and not being very happy about it.When that happens, you can't do any better than Justice Richmann does here. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 1:17 pm
Well, according to this opinion by the Court of Appeal, the correct answer is that (A) and (B) are definitely included and that (C) may well be included.I made up (D), so Justice Siggins expresses no opinion as to whether that's a burglary tool as well.Thankfully. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 11:22 am
As Justice King affirms both your conviction and sentence of six years in the pokey. [read post]
