Search for: "People v Lord" Results 1281 - 1300 of 1,806
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2011, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
Poor Gary Flitcroft was something of a standard bearer when he sought his injunction in A v B almost a decade ago. [read post]
31 May 2011, 11:30 pm by Michael Scutt
 As many people know, the maximum compensatory award that can be made for unfair dismissal by an Employment Tribunal is currently £68,400 (less at the time Ms Shoesmith was dismissed). [read post]
31 May 2011, 10:29 am by Nathan Koppel
Lord Conrad Black, the former media baron, was sitting relatively pretty when the Supreme Court last year narrowed the honest services law in U.S. v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 9:26 am by INFORRM
On the same programme Lord Prescott expressed trenchant views saying to Baroness Buscombe “you’ve got no control over the editors at the Press Complaint Commission. [read post]
25 May 2011, 12:35 pm by The Legal Blog
For example, the House of Lords may follow a Court of Appeal decision, and the Court of appeal may follow a High Court decision, although not strictly bound to do so. [read post]
25 May 2011, 5:57 am by INFORRM
In the Lord Browne case (Lord Browne v Associated Newspapers Ltd 2007) the judge agreed with Associated that knowing that there was a relationship between Lord Browne and Jeff Chevalier was ‘important background in authenticating in readers’ minds the other allegations they [the newspaper] wish to publish’ which were considered to be in the public interest. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am by Edward Craven, Matrix Chambers.
The meaning of “miscarriage of justice” in s. 133 was previously considered by the House of Lords in R (Mullen) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] UKHL 18; [2005] 1 AC 1. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:14 am by Legal Beagle
Avizandum : Court of Session judge Lord Woolman to rule on Scotland’s longest running civil damages claim. [read post]
22 May 2011, 5:01 pm by INFORRM
They are already compromising their supposed right to intrude into people’s privacy through the offices of the PCC. [read post]
22 May 2011, 6:14 am by Charon QC
CTB -v- Twitter, Inc. and Persons Unknown (Case No. [read post]
22 May 2011, 5:49 am by INFORRM
Democratic bodies may represent the people, but they have a distinct identity which may need protecting. [read post]
18 May 2011, 9:37 am
Board of Education.DOCUMENTARIESSilver GavelA Call to Act: Ledbetter v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 5:30 pm by INFORRM
The nature of the bar The House of Lords in Derbyshire CC v Times Newspapers Ltd ([1993] AC 534), decided that a local authority should not be able to sue in defamation. [read post]
14 May 2011, 1:46 pm by familoo
But Mr Booker assures us that, The only recourse left to those trying to establish the facts of such cases is rigorously to test what can be learned from the few people willing to speak, and to come to as informed and judicious a view as possible. [read post]
13 May 2011, 10:27 am by Charon QC
I cruise…) over to Anonymous Assistant: Feudal Bonds and thence to Magic Circle Minx: What Can Lord Sugar’s Tomato Task Teach Lawyers? [read post]
12 May 2011, 2:19 am by war
Symbion Pharmacy Services Pty Ltd v Idameneo (No 789) Limited [2011] FCA 389 [read post]
10 May 2011, 2:36 am by Charon QC
This followed the approach of the House of Lords decision in Fairchild v Glenhaven where the same test is applied where the Mesothelioma could have been caused by wrongful exposure to asbestos where there are two or more potential defendants. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:31 am by INFORRM
On Thursday 12 May 2011, the Administrative Court will hear the renewed application for permission to apply for judicial review by Lord Prescott, Chris Bryant MP and others (Queen (on the application of Bryant and ors) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis). [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:25 pm by NL
TG, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Lambeth (Shelter Intervening) [2011] EWCA Civ 526 The disconnection between Local Authority Social Services and housing departments has been a frequent topic here and in the courts, not least in the House of Lords decisions in R (G) v Southwark LBC [2009] UKHL 26 and R (M) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC [2008] UKHL 14. [read post]