Search for: "People v. Davis" Results 1281 - 1300 of 2,258
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2014, 7:52 am by Eric Penzer
 Constructive abandonment is routinely defined as the refusal of one spouse to engage in sexual relations with the other spouse for one or more years, when such refusal is unjustified, willful, and continual, and despite repeated requests for the resumption of sexual relations (see Davis v Davis, 71 AD3d 13 [2d Dept 2009]; Gianis v Gianis, 67 AD3d 963 [2d Dept 2009]). [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:52 am by Eric Penzer
 Constructive abandonment is routinely defined as the refusal of one spouse to engage in sexual relations with the other spouse for one or more years, when such refusal is unjustified, willful, and continual, and despite repeated requests for the resumption of sexual relations (see Davis v Davis, 71 AD3d 13 [2d Dept 2009]; Gianis v Gianis, 67 AD3d 963 [2d Dept 2009]). [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 6:04 am by admin
The following are several of the key Canadian misleading advertising law highlights from 2013. ____________________ Competition Bureau v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Silicon Valley billionaire investor Tim Draper recently unveiled a plan to divide up California into six separate states because, in his view, “California’s diverse population and economies [have] rendered the state nearly ungovernable. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 1:13 pm by Dave
 If they are, then the exception to those regs opened up by the ECJ in Teckal Srl v Commune di Viano applies. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 1:13 pm by Dave
 If they are, then the exception to those regs opened up by the ECJ in Teckal Srl v Commune di Viano applies. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 5:45 am by K.O. Herston
Related articles Transitional Alimony Lowered in Clarksville Divorce: Russell v. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
 3 and 4 December 2013 (Nicola Davies J). [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 11:12 am by Eugene Volokh
My students Tess Curet, Nathan Davis, and Michael Smith worked on the brief. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 9:38 pm by Buce
 Cute if unkind, but it's worth reflecting on when we consider Mandela v., oh well, almost anybody else in Africa. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
”  A state legislature’s constitutional inability to favor particular federal legislative candidates and disfavor others explains why the Supreme Court held a dozen years ago in Cook v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 1:54 pm by Sasha Volokh
This issue (and my take on it) will be familiar to those who have read my UC Davis L. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 7:10 am
The IPKat has reported a few times on the attention-riveting case of Resolution v Lundbeck. [read post]