Search for: "People v. Jeffrey"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 1,416
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2009, 6:36 pm
" It has been a truism since Marbury v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 10:27 am
" It has been a truism since Marbury v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 8:12 am
And (wait for it) ... segue to Brown v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 12:55 am
Keyes, special counsel at the firm, write: In Continental Casualty Co. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 12:38 am
The National Law Journal
The Supreme Court's unusual order Monday delaying a decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 4:24 am
I've written about the importance of access to post-conviction DNA testing and about District Attorney's Office for the Third Judicial District v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 2:28 am
Jeffrey Diotte
Subscription Required
ESSEX COUNTYFamily Law
Husband's Objections in Child Support Action Granted; Support Magistrate Abused Discretion
Saber v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 12:03 pm
Covinsky v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 6:33 am
Will SS thank Jeffrey Rosen in her nomination acceptance speech? [read post]
22 May 2009, 2:57 pm
People v. [read post]
16 May 2009, 9:41 am
"`Jurors are not expected to come into the jury box and leave behind all that their human experience has taught them.'" Beck v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 5:27 am
In an effort to defend his harsh "evaluation" of Judge Sonia Sotomayor's temperament, Jeffrey Rosen cites the Almanac of the Federal Judiciary. [read post]
7 May 2009, 2:38 pm
Latest Analyis: Scalia v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 9:40 am
It's for the people of Scotland. [read post]
4 May 2009, 1:26 am
The most controversial case in which Sotomayor participated is Ricci v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 7:24 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 12:45 am
The Court had asked for briefing on whether Jackson should be overturned in the context of Montejo v. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 12:52 pm
When in response to the prosecutor's question, the main prosecution witness falsely testified that she had received no benefit for he testimony, the prosecutor did not correct this "misstatement" as required (see People v Novoa, 70 NY2d 490, 496-498; People v Hendricks, 2 AD3d 1450, 1451, lv denied 2 NY3d 762; People v Potter, 254 AD2d 831, 832).2. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 1:43 am
[Ricci v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:54 pm
., and Jeffrey M. [read post]
