Search for: "Petite v. United States"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 12,269
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2010, 7:32 am
On December 6, 2010, the United States Supreme Court refused to grant Mr. [read post]
17 May 2017, 2:30 pm
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit’s reasoning in United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 9:42 am
United States. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 8:00 pm
United States 14-1535Issue: (1) Whether prosecutors are permitted to withhold materials covered by Brady v. [read post]
17 Jun 2017, 6:19 am
On consideration of Appellee’s petition for reconsideration of this Court’s decision, United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:17 pm
United States, No. 10-710, has been distributed for Friday’s conference. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 3:32 am
In Lawrence v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 9:44 pm
” United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 11:32 am
United States [docket; cert. petition, PDF] to determine the level of intent that must be proven for a bank fraud conviction. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 6:26 am
Only one argued case remains undecided — United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 10:50 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 5:59 pm
Sill waiting for an opinion in United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 7:59 am
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit’s reasoning in United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 9:51 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:10 am
United States 14-29Issue: (1) Whether, in a prosecution for insider trading under § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 11:47 am
Yesterday we filed this cert. amicus brief on behalf of the National Association of Assistant United States Attorneys and the National District Attorneys Association in No. 08-1065, Pottawattamie County, Iowa v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 12:15 pm
In No. 08-640, Federal Insurance Co. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 1:32 pm
¶7 Nguyen’s petition for review was granted solely on the included offense issue. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 2:21 pm
Finding first that Appellant introduced deadly force into the situation, thereby eliminating the ability of further escalation, citing United States v. [read post]
