Search for: "Petition of United States" Results 1281 - 1300 of 21,937
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2022, 5:50 pm by JP Sarmiento
CASE: Marriage-Based Adjustment of Status CLIENT: Filipina LOCATION: Port Clinton, OH Our client came to the United States from the Philippines in September 2021. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 7:44 pm by Mary Dwyer
The petitions of the day are: Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 9:28 am
The Government has filed its opposition to the recon petition in United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 8:18 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
From the order list: The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted limited to the following question: Whether the D. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 7:15 am by Maureen Johnston
United States 13-983Issue: Whether, consistent with the First Amendment and Virginia v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 6:45 am by Maureen Johnston
§ 1605(a)(2), a tort claim for personal injuries suffered in connection with travel outside of the United States is “based upon” the allegedly tortious conduct occurring outside of the United States or the preceding sale of the ticket in the United States for the travel entirely outside the United States. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 10:52 pm by JP Sarmiento
CASE: Adjustment of Status Based on Approved K-1 Visa CLIENT: Filipina LOCATION: Akron, OH Our client came to the United States in September 2021 as a K-1 visa entrant from the Philippines. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 7:29 pm by JP Sarmiento
Our client was born and raised in the Philippines, and has maintained his non-immigrant status lawfully in the United States. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 2:03 am by JP Sarmiento
  Our client came to the United States with a B-2 visitor’s visa to see his wife in December 2021. [read post]
Mohammadi, who has spent over 10 years of her life in prison, is currently imprisoned on charges including committing “propaganda activity against the state” and “collusion against state security. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 5:59 pm by John Ehrett
United States 14-419Issue: Whether the pretrial restraint of a criminal defendant's legitimate, untainted assets (those not traceable to a criminal offense) needed to retain counsel of choice violates the Fifth and Sixth Amendments. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 8:34 am
Siebert, the United States Supreme Court concludes, in a 7-2 Per Curiam decision, that the 11th Circuit Court of Appeal was wrong in finding that the time for filing a federal petition under AEDPA was not tolled due to the filing of a state court petition because the state court petition was not "properly filed" as it was untimely. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 8:20 am by Helen Klein
In the United States, Chief Justice Burger concluded that inquiring into “whether a committing court had proper jurisdiction” is at the center of habeas’ constitutional core. [read post]
While federal common law is not explicitly mentioned in § 1331, the fossil fuel companies cite precedent under United States v. [read post]