Search for: "Prince v State"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 1,431
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2019, 5:59 am
Section II-A argued that the test of Lemon v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 10:12 pm
(Other state anti-stalking statutes can be found here.) [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 4:46 pm
The apparent justification was that she was a family member of a PEP, a reference to her father, who is the son of Prince Michael of Kent and 43rd in line to the throne. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 12:33 pm
This is kind of ridiculous even without the Roman numerals (though I could give you about XCIV reasons why you shouldn’t go above V with those). [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 10:18 am
The designation "Fürst", and its feminine form "Fürstin", mean "prince" and "princess" respectively. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC affirms validity and enforceability of Eisai’s compound patent on Aciphex; elucidates current standard for obviousness of chemical composition of matter patents: Eisai v Reddy’s Lab’s and Teva Pharma: (Orange Book Blog), (Patent Docs), (Patent Prospector), (IP Law360), (Hal Wegner), (Patent Baristas),… [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 2:58 pm
He guards the sleep of his pauper master as if he were a prince. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
”[72] Justice L’Heureux-Dubé, however, did not agree that an expression stated in the positive (i.e., a “significant contributing cause”) meant the same thing as one stated in the negative (i.e., “not a trivial cause”). [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:34 pm
Co. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 3:30 am
Feist Publ’ns, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 2:38 pm
Here the state adopts an approach emblematic of private governance. [read post]
26 May 2020, 6:30 am
What makes it marginal is not Texas v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
” The article reports views from a conference in the United States where the attendees noted there was a whole new industry of reputation-restoration firms like the UK-based Kwikch [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 5:56 am
Seng v. the TMO On 20 February 2019, the TMO rejected the trade mark application (Decision [2019] No. 34784, ‘the TMO’s decision’) for violating Article 10.1(8) of the Trade Mark Law of China (TML, 2013 Amendment),* an absolute ground for refusal and invalidity that applies when a sign is ‘detrimental to socialist morality or mores or having any other adverse effect’. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 8:26 pm
There is not a lot of precedent in this area (but see one of our favorites, Online Policy Group v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 6:04 pm
States are generally allowed to limit the dissemination of facts that are private in nature. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 12:09 pm
NEA v. [read post]
19 Sep 2009, 6:55 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 12:18 am
Princess Caroline’s new application to the court appears to be something of a repeat of her previous case, as it concerns the publication, without her consent, of photographs of her and her husband, Prince Ernst August von Hannover, and stories about her private life. [read post]
