Search for: "ROBERT JACKSON" Results 1281 - 1300 of 3,875
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Jackson Jr.; The Untenable Case for Keeping Investors in the Dark (discussed on the Forum here) by Lucian Bebchuk, Robert J. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 10:25 pm
Jackson Jr., (discussed on the Forum here) and The Untenable Case for Keeping Investors in the Dark by Lucian Bebchuk, Robert J. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 8:22 am by Frank Pasquale
I’d also like to see them complement a broad set of proposals articulated by Robert Hockett in a recent piece in the Washington University Law Review. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 12:30 pm by John Ross
[Veterans' benefits, Robert's Rules of Order, and Floribama.] [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 11:47 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Robert Jackson was a backcountry lawyer in Upstate New York who later became chief prosecutor in the Nuremberg trials. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 3:15 am by NCC Staff
In later years, Solicitors General Robert Jackson, Stanley Reed and Elena Kagan would move onto the Supreme Court. 7. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 7:45 am by Cass Sunstein
Equally surely, it does not include George Crabbe, Robert Southey, Barry Cornwall, Leigh Hunt and Mary Brunton. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 12:30 am by ernst
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the Roberts Court claimed authority to overturn Roe v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 8:58 pm by Jonathan Hafetz
In a recent brief to the Court of Military Commissions Review (CMCR), the Pentagon cited an 1818 military commission convened by General Andrew Jackson to execute two British men, Robert Ambrister and Alexander George Arbuthnot, for assisting the Seminole Indians after U.S. forces had invaded then-Spanish Florida to prevent black slaves from escaping. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 12:24 pm by Margaret Wood
  In 1821, Secret Proceedings and Debates of the Convention Assembled at Philadelphia in the year of 1787 … from the Notes taken by the late Robert Yates, Esq. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 10:30 am by jleaming@acslaw.org
Political expediency, rather than constitutional fealty, will become the rule of law, and Justice Robert Jackson’s immortal statement about withdrawing questions of constitutional rights from ‘the vicissitudes of political controversy’ and placing them ‘beyond the reach of majorities and officials’ will be stood on its head. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 6:01 am
Jackson, Jr., and Joshua Mitts, the study described by the post as providing the empirical basis for the proposed Bill. [read post]