Search for: "ROMANS v. ROMANS"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 1,942
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2025, 9:00 pm
Roman Catholic Bishop of Portland. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 1:09 pm
Just as the Supreme Court is preparing for oral argument regarding the validity under the Equal Protection clause of same-sex marriage restrictions on the 26th (Hollingsworth v. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 6:41 am
Citing its previous decision in Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 4:00 am
Grzelak v. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 8:22 am
Webster v. [read post]
3 May 2015, 6:42 pm
Justice Rouleau stated in O’Donohue v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 1:20 pm
Milligan and in Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 2:00 am
Supreme Court in Reves v. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 10:33 am
Wade-rescuing opinion in Casey v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 7:30 am
Marsh, Goldman v. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 5:54 am
There could be a third argument- i.e. that they both had the same idea, contributed significant relevant originality (Brighton v Jones [2004]) and, in fact, the selfies are works of joint authorship; there being collaboration present and no need for an intention to create a joint work (Beckingham v Hodgens [2002]). [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 3:53 pm
Hund went on to argue for the same interpretation of Jones v. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 2:19 pm
Before anyone else emails the IPKat to let him know, he can tell you that he is fully aware of the two big trade mark rulings from the Court of Appeal for England and Wales last Friday in Société Des Produits Nestlé S.A. v Cadbury UK Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 1174 and JW Spear & Son Ltd, Mattel Inc and Mattel UK Ltd v Zynga Inc [2013] EWCA Civ 1175 and he will be providing separate Katposts on them in the fullness of time. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 9:49 am
Hansen In Pulido v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 6:09 am
The Court identified the inherent risks of arbitrary government action in secret surveillance in the present case and found again—following its stance in Roman Zakharov v. [read post]
5 May 2013, 9:43 pm
No puede ser válido que en aras de buscar una nueva forma de administrar justicia, se permita que sean pisoteados los derechos de los trabajadores de los tribunales, sean de carácter federal o estatal, sean del poder judicial o de los tribunales administrativos que imparten justicia en forma de juicio, sin ser precisamente juzgadores profesionales. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 10:25 pm
For what I know, he will be joined at tomorrow's IPCom v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 5:56 am
On SOLO IP, Barbara Cookson flags an initiative by fellow solo practitioner Roman Cholij who, wearing a slightly different hat, has put together an Oxford conference programme on Patents on Life [this Kat has heard a rumour that outspoken fellow blogger and IP soloist Michael Factor may be speaking ...]. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 10:58 am
We think of them as white but Greeks and Romans painted them. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 5:22 am
Here's how our Supreme Court put it in McDonald v. [read post]
