Search for: "Reach v. State" Results 1281 - 1300 of 37,339
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2024, 9:08 am by Marcel Pemsel
The CJEU answered the question in the affirmative but the court seized will only have jurisdiction to decide on the damage caused in the territory of the Member State to which it belongs. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 9:24 am by Giles Peaker
Moreover, he stated that pocket money for her children was not “an essential expenditure” and she could “make further savings on this expenditure of £100-£120 a month. [read post]
Judicial oversight is therefore essential, but not onerous, to narrow the state’s online reach and ensure that the decision to disclose information is consistent with the Charter. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 7:26 pm by Ilya Somin
There have been several previous such cases, including three appellate court decisions, and Judge Ezra's own recent ruling in United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 5:16 pm by Tom Ginsburg
The famous Brandeis brief appears around that time, in such cases as Muller v. [read post]