Search for: "Russell v State"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 2,847
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2020, 4:05 am
Forest Service v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:29 am
” At Quartz, Ephrat Livni discusses Dassey v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 3:57 am
Amy Howe analyzes yesterday’s argument in United States v. [read post]
24 May 2018, 4:11 am
Louisiana, a cert petition asserting that the state failed to comply in a murder case with its obligation to disclose exculpatory evidence under Brady v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 4:29 am
United States, an ineffective assistance of counsel case involving mandatory deportation, TC Heartland LLC v. [read post]
25 May 2018, 4:15 am
” At Constitution Daily, Scott Bomboy highlights Janus v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 4:11 am
Other coverage comes from Katie Barlow and Nina Totenberg at NPR, while in his “Drama at the Court” series for ISCOTUSnow, Christopher Schmidt looks back at United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., is among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the respondents in Zubik. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 4:20 am
Sellers, which asks when a federal court in a habeas case should “look through” a summary state-court ruling to review the last reasoned state-court decision. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 4:19 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel on an amicus brief in support of the petitioners in this case.] [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 4:04 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel on an amicus brief in support of the petitioners in this case.] [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 9:07 am
It is ironic that MacLean falsely accuses of James Buchanan and other libertarians of opposing Brown v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 12:23 pm
The Supreme Court heard oral argument today in Janus v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
9 May 2020, 4:16 pm
” Blisset v. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 8:18 am
2004) “[I]ncarceration, as a foreseeable result of criminal activity, does not ipso facto relieve one of the obligation to pay child support” Meyer v. [read post]
9 May 2007, 1:04 pm
Russell Petrak by phone on June 10, 2000, to obtain discharge orders for the plaintiff. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 11:15 am
” “[P]arents may create an enforceable agreement for modification of child support only by petitioning the court for support modification and then establishing, to the satisfaction of the court, that an agreement reached between the parents is in accord with the best interests of the children” Blisset v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 5:29 am
Troxel v. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 11:17 am
” People v. [read post]
