Search for: "STAND et al. v. STATE." Results 1281 - 1300 of 2,184
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Case No.: 6:07-cv-839-Orl-35-KRS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et. al., Respondents. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 6:52 am by Howard Knopf
    Case: 33921Entertainment Software Association, et al. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 11:48 am by Rosalind English
The subject is amply and philosophically discussed in publications by Professors Dawn Oliver, Carol Harlow et al. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 5:44 am by Steve Vladeck
According to various media reports, General Stanley McChrystal suggested late last month that the United States should bring back the draft if it goes to war again, arguing that the costs of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have not been adequately spread across different segments of the U.S. population… Without delving into the merits of General McChrystal’s remarks as a policy matter, they present a useful opportunity to reflect on one of the most significant Supreme Court… [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 1:11 pm
Lemley et al., Life After Bilski, 63 Stan. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 12:02 pm
Supreme Court’s 2011 term, saw a surprising and important decision handed down in National Federation of Independent Business et al. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 12:02 pm
Supreme Court’s 2011 term, saw a surprising and important decision handed down in National Federation of Independent Business et al. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 9:23 am by David M. McLain
Alpert Homes, Inc., et al., found that a builder’s duty of reasonable care in construction of a residence owed to a homeowner is just that. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 3:00 am by Louis M. Solomon
Because of the importance to international practice generally of class or collective actions, on which we have posted with some frequency from time to time, we report on the decision in Provine, et al. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 6:32 am
Case Summary Coalition for Responsible Regulation, et al. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 6:32 am
Case Summary Coalition for Responsible Regulation, et al. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 3:45 pm
Neste Enterprises et al. that personal trainers under California state law could not be liable for negligence for any injuries a client suffers from a too-strenuous workout. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 9:42 am by Chris Castle
But the case that every first year law student encounters within days of starting their Torts class (unless taught by a pamphleteer) is Bird v. [read post]