Search for: "STATE v MATTHEWS"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 3,606
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2018, 11:04 am
The Ninth, happily, demands The Chair.United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2018, 12:48 pm
In United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 1:15 pm
United States and Intercollegiate Broadcasting Systems Inc. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 10:34 am
Criminal procedure — Illegal sentence — Credit for time served Matthew Robert Kirby noted an appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Baltimore County denying his motion to correct an illegal sentence. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 9:39 am
This post was authored by Matthew Loeser, Esq. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 4:34 pm
Merrifield, Elizabeth V. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 12:44 pm
And in 1926, Supreme Court Chief Justice William Howard Taft said in Myers v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 12:08 pm
Given the statutory ambiguities, readers may wonder why the Park Service’s reading of ANILCA and its own enabling acts would not be entitled to deference from the Supreme Court under Chevron v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 10:16 am
Under Tevis v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 8:00 am
In Virginia Uranium v. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 4:13 am
At SCOTUS OA, Matthew Sag discusses the reargument order in Knick v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 8:00 am
Magliocca makes a good case for why such appeals to fixity were likely unavoidable in the United States. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 5:48 am
This post was authored by Matthew Loeser, Esq. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 4:06 pm
This post was authored by Matthew Loeser, Esq. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 3:58 pm
This post was authored by Matthew Loeser, Esq. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 3:45 am
” In an op-ed for The Hill, Mark Miller urges the justices to review Marquette County Road Commission v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 3:56 pm
This post was authored by Matthew Loeser, Esq. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 3:02 am
“The Supreme Court should…reaffirm that the Constitution’s prohibition against ex post facto lawmaking forbids states from skirting constitutional scrutiny by simply labeling penalties as ‘civil'” [Ilya Shapiro and Nathan Harvey on Cato certiorari brief in Bethea v. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 4:59 pm
On 17 October 2017 the Court of Appeal (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson) heard the appeal in the case of Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 2:43 pm
Matthews, Jr. [read post]