Search for: "STATE v. HILL"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 5,193
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2018, 4:32 am
For The Washington Post, Ellen Nakashima reports that the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 12:21 pm
The case, Macfarlan v. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 7:44 pm
As the state put it in the cert. petition, “But this sort of prejudice — the perceived prejudice associated with a longer sentence — is not the sort of prejudice that Hill [v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:17 am
Both place their faith in the state, and in the community, to be sure. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 8:05 am
” Julie Rovner of Governing reports that many states are poised to ban abortion, if Roe v. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 8:39 am
" This was stated in the 1937, Texas Supreme Court case, Universal Life & Accident Insurance Company v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 7:57 am
It happens in Grand Prairie, Weatherford, Arlington, Dallas, Fort Worth, Roanoke, Keller, Colleyville, North Richland Hills, Grapevine, and all over the state. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 4:21 pm
State v Casillas. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 5:17 am
Hill v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 7:22 am
’” Brunswick Hills Racquet Club, Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 7:11 am
Florida and United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 7:53 am
The Hill reports that Lambda Legal said the Justice Department announced the policy change in federal court on Thursday, “more than a month after the Supreme Court legalized same-sex marriage. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 5:36 am
When the Supreme Court hears arguments on Monday in Baze v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 8:55 am
Hill delivered the decision.C.J. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 1:55 am
Case Name: Javorina v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 1:55 am
Case Name: Javorina v. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 8:22 am
Zimmerman v Wabaunsee County. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 10:48 am
Like me (but he expresses it far more eloquently in Virtualpurple), Norris J prefers the decision of HHJ McCahill QC in Hill v Stokes Plc [2010] EWHC 3726. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 3:08 am
Because the Federal Aviation Administration’s (“FAA’) airspace redesign projects throughout the United States have apparently negatively impacted hundreds of thousands, even millions, of people, and because we have received a number of requests for a discussion of the bases for the currently pending challenge to the FAA’s SoCal Metroplex airspace redesign project, a copy of the Opening Brief of Petitioners City of Culver City, California; Santa Monica Canyon Civic… [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
Second, the federal RFRA is unconstitutional when applied to state law under Boerne v. [read post]
