Search for: "Sales v. State" Results 1281 - 1300 of 21,150
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am by David Kopel
But not to prohibit possession or sales for adults. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:47 am by INFORRM
United States On 21 February 2023, the Supreme Court heard arguments in the case of Gonzalez v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 2:00 am by Anna Maria Stein
Regarding the CJEU decision in Audi v OHIM C‑398/08,  the GC noted that the factual context of the case was substantially different, since the slogan “Vorsprung durch Technik” was considered renowned and had been used for many years by Audi to promote the sale of its motor vehicles in class 12. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm by admin
The school lost its accreditation in 1946, and closed.[19] After receiving this degree, Selikoff continued his efforts to return to Scotland, to complete his “triple qualification” for medical licensure in Scotland, which would allow him to sit for the licensing examination in one of the United States. 1943 – 1944. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 4:39 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
” 100 years ago, a TM was a fanciful or arbitrary word or symbol attached to a good at the point of sale, and nothing else was a TM. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 8:18 am by James W. Ward
Ecolab relied on federal regulation CFR 778.210, which states that a percentage bonus based on straight time and overtime earnings satisfies federal overtime requirements. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 7:07 am by Eleonora Rosati
Standard International Management v EUIPO Case T-768/20 EU General Court (July 2022)Can a hotel in the United States use an EU trade mark? [read post]
The decision in question, made by the General Court of the EU – Standard International Management LLC v EUIPO – has clarified that use of EU trade marks in advertisements and offers for sale constitute acts of use of an EU trade mark. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 3:30 am by Kevin Kaufman
Their prominence in public policy considerations is further enhanced by individuals being actively responsible for filing their income taxes, in contrast to the indirect payment of sales and excise taxes. [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 10:12 am by Cannabis Law Group
But then in a federal breach of contract case involving a state-legal cannabis company (Siva Enterprises v. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm by INFORRM
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently issued an opinion in Pino v Cardone Capital, LLC that followed the Eleventh Circuit ruling in Wildes v BitConnect, finding that if a person promotes the sale of a security on social media, that person may qualify as a “seller” under Section 12 of the Security Act of 1933. [read post]