Search for: "Sharp v. Sharp"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 4,115
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2018, 3:04 am
For practitioners the message was that whilst there may be a grace period for adjustments post-Brexit, it may be wiser to take action now in order to avoid issues such as being unable to service clients, and the rush to meet EUIPO guides that will likely incur high costs.The Keynote: Key Trade Mark Cases of the Last 12 monthsBenet Brandreth QC (11 South Square) gave an enthusiastic review of some of the most interesting Trade Mark cases in the last 12 months; such as Cartier v B Sky B;… [read post]
Case o' The Week: Not an "Offense" to Violate Supervised Release in the Ninth - Jensen and Sec. 3146
21 Jan 2013, 5:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:59 am
Reyes v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 8:20 am
Sharpe, The Law of Habeas Corpus 5 (1990). [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 11:19 pm
In today’s case (Lougheed Estate v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 5:06 am
In National Assn of Broadcasters v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 2:49 am
Harding v Wealands [2007] 1 AC 1, under the pre-existing English rules of applicable law). [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 9:36 am
The Fifth Circuit, however, needed to consider whether liability under these circumstances conflicted with its prior holding in Estate of Sharp v. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 8:23 pm
V, at p. 222). [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:55 pm
Yesterday, the Supreme Court handed down its ruling in Rent-a-Center v. [read post]
8 May 2010, 8:53 am
In The Mortgage Specialists, Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 12:30 pm
As the Court found in New York Times v. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 10:47 am
Apple Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:41 am
In the case of New Mexico v. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 3:00 am
Merck Sharp & Dohme, 796 F.3d 1038 (9th Cir. 2015). [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 1:54 am
" Cotler v. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 6:17 am
Szegfu undoubtedly marked a sharp change of judicial direction. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 4:59 pm
On Friday 22 April 2016, the Court of Appeal (Sharp and Hamblen LJJ) heard an application for permission to appeal in the case of Sloutsker v Romanova. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 2:05 am
The Court of Appeal (Dame Victoria Sharp P, Sir Geoffrey Vos C and Davis LJ) unanimously allowed Mr Lloyd’s appeal (with the Chancellor giving the only substantive judgment), granting him permission to serve out. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 7:07 am
In short, as Briggs LJ said, it requires the reviewing officer to apply a sharp focus, not just simply a formulaic answer. [read post]
