Search for: "State v Sparks" Results 1281 - 1300 of 1,402
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2016, 9:28 pm by Kim Kirschenbaum
But the Court’s 2009 decision, Entergy Corp. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am by centerforartlaw
This iterative process continued in countries like India and China, each factory adding its own interpretation and modifications along the way.[17] Wiesner stated, “One thing we’re always so amazed by is the creativity that comes out of the half of the process when producing an object [in a factory]. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
The article sparked conspiracy theories and the spread of further misinformation on the virus’ origin around the world, including being repeated by the Mail Online, and published, and then later amended, by the Daily Star in the UK. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 9:03 am by Ronald Collins
It will also spark a debate among scholars, lawyers and others in the legal community over the use of procedure to alter substantive worker rights. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The majority opinion’s rationale in In the Matter of Nonhuman Rights Project, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 5:43 am by Dennis Crouch
As reported by Reuters, the draft EU Proposal was scheduled to be announced by EC Vice President Margrethe Vestager on April 26, but the leaked draft has already sparked significant commentary and debate (see summaries, with links, posted by Tom Cotter and Florian Mueller). [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 1:01 pm by centerforartlaw
On the morning of the hearing, Kirsha Kaechele led twenty-five women dressed in navy power suits, pearls, and red lipstick into the courtroom.[28] In a blog post, the artist describes how they “moved in silent synchronicity, crossing and uncrossing their pantyhosed legs [pause], leaning forward in their navy suits [pause], peering over their tortoiseshell spectacles [pause], and applying lipstick” for two hours straight.[29] Even the judge noted their behavior in his ruling,… [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 11:10 am by Howard Knopf
 These include questions about the “Premium” and “Choice” offerings and the state of AC’s licensing negotiations.It is also notable that Mr. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:41 pm by Kurt R. Karst
The PR states that LDTs are not the “practice of medicine,” with which FDA generally may not interfere. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 8:14 am by Tobin Admin
The crew truck driver slowed the truck and saw that the sparks were coming from a car that was “flipping over” on the highway. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 10:00 am
It's a journey that takes us back to a time before most of us were born, long before the Voting Rights Act, and the Civil Rights Act, Brown v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am by rainey Reitman
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia) Court’s… [read post]