Search for: "State v. Baker"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 2,916
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2009, 10:17 am
" United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 10:00 am
The case since has settled.Computer Fraud and Abuse ActThe most significant CFAA case of the past several years has been United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 4:44 am
The decision is posted on the Internet at: http://www.courts.state.ny.us/reporter/3dseries/2012/2012_05693.htm =================== The Discipline Book, - a concise guide to disciplinary actions involving public employees in New York State. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 8:04 am
Baker, 172 U. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 8:36 am
United States. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 4:40 am
Baker, 45 F.3d 837, 844-845 (4th Cir. 1995); United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 9:19 pm
So do you agree that marriage is a question reserved for the states to decide based on Baker v. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 8:31 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Deanna Austin v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 7:11 pm
The Court should have perhaps established a ‘litmus test’ setting out criteria to determine instances when one has been “prejudiced enough” something akin to the balancing test set out in the American case, Baker v Wingo[22]. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 3:25 pm
Every other state supreme court to consider such a claim has rejected it, as Justice Baker described in her dissent. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm
However, the Court was not satisfied there was any flaw in the Council's decision making. 'Due regard' under s.71 Race Relations Act meant appropriate in the circumstances ( Baker v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2008] EWCA Civ 141), including the countervailing factors. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm
However, the Court was not satisfied there was any flaw in the Council's decision making. 'Due regard' under s.71 Race Relations Act meant appropriate in the circumstances ( Baker v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2008] EWCA Civ 141), including the countervailing factors. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:20 am
Yesterday, in Trump v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 11:02 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Alva Leslie Funk v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 1:07 pm
That turned up cases applying the same rationale under federal law: Baker v. [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 4:59 am
Lopez v. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 8:14 pm
More than five decades ago, the “one-person, one-vote” rulings of the Warren Court, especially Baker v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 12:39 pm
From the point of view of the four states involved in the cases, their lawyers apparently will not be prevented from making arguments on two points to try to help them salvage their bans: first, the Supreme Court settled that issue in a summary ruling in 1972 in the case of Baker v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 4:34 pm
The second common issue in the cases is the impact, if any, on the new cases of a 1972 Supreme Court decision, Baker v. [read post]
