Search for: "State v. C. G. B."
Results 1281 - 1300
of 2,316
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm
The A-G’s opinion is available here: Case C-498/16, Schrems v Facebook Ireland Ltd The Panopticon Blog has a post about the recent A-G’s opinion in the Facebook fan page case (Case C-210/16) pointing out that opinion casts the net very wide, bringing multiple entities into the definition of data controllers. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 7:17 pm
JM 9-28.210(A)(B), citing U.S. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 5:51 am
” Dinova v. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 5:52 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Brent G. [read post]
2 Apr 2025, 2:59 pm
These include: (1) articles subject to 50 USC 1702(b); (2) steel/aluminum articles and autos/auto parts already subject to Section 232 tariffs; (3) copper, pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, and lumber articles; (4) all articles that may become subject to future Section 232 tariffs; (5) bullion; and (6) energy and other certain minerals that are not available in the United States.For Canada and Mexico, the existing fentanyl/migration IEEPA orders remain in effect, and are unaffected by… [read post]
4 Dec 2021, 7:39 am
Kim v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 1:52 pm
(as stated by the judge). [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 1:37 pm
(as stated by the judge). [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 5:14 pm
H.S.P. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:00 am
In Brown v. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 12:24 pm
Some of those benefits include (a) not having a committee of unsecured creditors appointed (except for cause, after notice and a hearing) whose attorney’s fees would be paid by the debtor’s estate, (b) 90 days from the petition date for the debtor to file a plan, (c) elimination of the ability of other parties to file a competing plan, (d) a much easier road to confirmation of a Chapter 11 plan with elimination of the absolute priority rule and the Court’s ability… [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 7:10 am
For the Convention system, in its recent judgment in Gäfgen v. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 12:21 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 9:28 am
Hoffman & Robert C. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 9:28 am
Hoffman & Robert C. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 7:35 pm
., v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 10:28 am
CiteID=461971Appeal from the District Court of Johnson County, the Honorable John G. [read post]
13 May 2011, 8:01 pm
Solis v. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 10:26 pm
§ 241.4(g)(ii)). [read post]
18 Apr 2006, 3:50 pm
Noting a split of authority in the decided cases on whether a filing in violation of 109(g) is void ab initio, Judge Isgur concluded instead that 362(b)(21) was adopted "with the apparent intent to legislatively overrule courts that were misapplying the statute as written. [read post]
