Search for: "State v. Case"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 193,580
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2014, 2:24 pm
United States. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 4:24 pm
United States. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 2:24 pm
United States. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 9:17 am
United States. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 9:17 am
United States. [read post]
29 May 2014, 12:43 pm
United States. [read post]
29 May 2014, 12:43 pm
United States. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 3:55 am
Swadner (PDF format) in Swadner v. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 8:49 am
United States. [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 6:34 am
Co. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 2:30 am
On appeal from: [2017] EWCA Civ 2028 These appeals raised common issues regarding the scope of the Ruiz Zambrano v Office national de l’emploi (Case C-34/09) [2012] QB 265 (“Zambrano”) principle which states that a non-member state national (“TCN”) parent of a European Union citizen child resident within the EU is entitled to reside in the EU. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 8:14 pm
The Utah Court of Appeal issued the decision in State v. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 4:49 am
Garcia, a case raising the question of federal preemption of the application of a state identity fraud law in a case involving criminal prosecutions of undocumented immigrants. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 12:10 pm
Contact attorney Tom James.The post Case Update: Andersen v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 11:26 am
Criminal Procedure Reopen and amend provisions This appeal is about a "reopen-and-amend" provision of a plea agreement, a phrase coined by prior Wisconsin case law referring to those plea bargains where the State and defendant agree that a judgment of conviction, once announced, will be amended by the State upon the happening of some future event. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 6:54 am
Further, the court rejected the State's claim that recent legislative changes to the Victim's Rights Act had effectively overruled the holding in Pouncey v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 7:59 am
Check the Wood v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 4:31 pm
On 19 January 2016 the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in R (on application of Miranda) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2016] EWCA Civ 6). [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 10:53 am
Previously Participated as Counsel for the State Article 30.01 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure and Article V, Section 11, of the Texas Constitution both require the disqualification of a judge “who has previously participated as counsel for the State in a pending matter. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 2:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
