Search for: "State v. Case"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 193,580
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2024, 9:29 am
The case M.A. and Others v France was ruled unanimously. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 7:16 am
Supreme Court’s Moody v. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Supreme Court in Worcester v. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
” In The Brig Wilson v. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
The Inter-American Court of Human Rights previously ruled against Ecuador in Paola Guzmán Albarracín v. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 6:11 am
This is part of a remarkable trend with the ICJ hearing a flurry of cases with a human rights focus, from the Gambia v. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 5:53 am
The Court applies the famous ruling in Tinker v. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 5:31 am
Washington (2020) (quoting The Pocket Veto Case (1929)); accord, Vidal v. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 4:55 am
In Biden v. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 4:05 am
In Cowles v. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 4:00 am
When can income be imputed to a parent when determining child support in Tennessee? [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 3:56 am
Initiative v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
With the consolidation order, Michael Parnell’s case is merged with Stewart Parnell v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
Oneida, a case involving state taxation of reclaimed ancestral lands. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:02 pm
The court stated that the Plaintiff “ha[d] not painted the extreme picture present” in cases where it has found potential Caremark liability. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
United States, Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 8:26 pm
Hudson Valley LLC v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 2:45 pm
E. coli O157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2]respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and… [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 2:03 pm
” The court had no difficulty applying Olmstead to the case, holding that the state had to provide the services in the adult group home where the plaintiff lived, rather than offering them only in a nursing facility.The Ninth Circuit held that DSHS was violating Title II of the ADA by failing to provide long term care in an integrated community setting rather than a nursing home.Olmstead does not require DSHS to increase the number of slots on the HCBS waiting lists (see… [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 1:34 pm
FTC, Case No. 3:24-CV-00986 (N.D. [read post]