Search for: "State v. German"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 3,001
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2019, 9:13 am
Also, see Appeal Court of Düsseldorf stating that the different treatment of SEP licensees is accepted if it can be justified as a result of normal market behaviour, and that licensing conditions can be abusive, only if they are significantly different between licensees; see Sisvel v Haier, Appeal Court of Düsseldorf, 30 March 2017 - Case No. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 5:20 am
Court of Appeal’s decision in September 2018 in Director of the Serious Fraud Office v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 9:47 am
These cases include Reed v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:13 am
V–Sketch of the Geology of Mississippi Art. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 10:34 am
The German Federal Court of Justice (BGH) had referred the following questions to the ECJ for a preliminary ruling: (1) Do the courts of the Member State within the territory of which insolvency proceedings regarding the debtor's assets have been opened have international jurisdiction under Regulation [No 1346/2000] in respect of an action in the context of the insolvency to set a… [read post]
9 May 2023, 6:30 am
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm
Furthermore, the applicant had failed to include this claim in his application: the Court clarified that failure to state a claim in the application cannot be compensated by introducing the claim at the hearing (unless the plea is based on matters of law or of fact which come to light in the course of the procedure), as stated by Article 48(2) of the Rules of procedure of the General Court and held in previous case law (Case T‑246/06, Redcats SA v OHIM). [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 3:33 am
And on Friday (December 6), the Munich I Regional Court will announce a ruling on a German Nokia v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 10:12 pm
Gates ["Al-Maqaleh II"] and Hamidullah v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 11:21 pm
Int’l., Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
Article V, because it requires two-thirds of Congress and three-fourths of the states, is, as Sandy Levinson has put it, functionally dead. [read post]
8 Oct 2006, 1:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 1:33 am
(OLG Frankfurt a.M.) had to deal with the extraterritorial effect of so-called US secondary sanctions on contracts to which German law is applicable. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 1:42 am
After the latest developments in the dispute between Lindt and its German competitor Riegelein (see our report here), the Austrian state broadcaster ORF now reports on the latest instalment in the gold bunny dispute between Lindt and its Austrian competitor Hauswirth. [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 10:25 am
See Freytag v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 3:00 am
Bauman, 571 U.S. 117, 137-138 (2014), the Supreme Court rejected general jurisdiction over the German carmaker Daimler in California’s state court. [read post]
16 May 2019, 6:30 am
Levinson and Balkin mention Shelby County v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 3:41 am
Private copying levy systems are not harmonised in the EU, and some Member States do not even collect levies or decided to get rid of them altogether. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 11:50 pm
– Most German-speaking scholars and some German courts consider participation in virtual court proceedings from a foreign state of residence to be a violation of foreign sovereignty. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 1:18 am
The defendants, Sportradar, were a German company and its Swiss parent. [read post]
