Search for: "State v. Holderness" Results 1281 - 1300 of 8,247
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2020, 3:55 pm by CAFE
Supreme Court, opinion & dissent, 5/29/07 United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 9:48 am by Justine Moller
Where the holder requires exclusive or other use of the whole or any portion of the prospecting or mining area, the holder has an obligation to acquire a lease to use the same as agreed between such holder and the landowner or lawful occupier. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 1:44 am by Sophia Tang
Background The UK Supreme Court delivered the landmark judgment on Unwired Planet v Huawei and Conversant v Huawei and ZTE, [2020] UKSC 37 on 26 Aug 2020. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 9:03 pm by Lynn McDonough
– Writing for the Court in United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 6:26 pm by Amy Howe
Neither of her parents attended college: Her father, Nathan, came to the United States from Russia as a teenager and worked as a furrier; her mother, Celia Amster Bader, was born a few months after her parents arrived in the country from Austria and worked in a garment factory to put her brother through college. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 3:39 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
We are happy to report that the Department of State has released an important announcement that describes the agency’s compliance with the recent court ruling, Gomez v. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 3:06 am by Keith Mallinson
Delrahim rightly states that “[w]e should not transform commitments to license on FRAND terms into a compulsory licensing scheme. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 7:03 am by John Jascob
(U.S. 2000, holding that the state’s right to control the issuance of gaming licenses implicated its role as sovereign, not as property holder). [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 7:30 am by Michelle Onibokun, Chuck Rosenberg
As the election approached, Bharara faced a dilemma: The entire state assembly was up for reelection in November 2012. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 11:08 am by Steven F. Huefner
Virginia State Board of Elections and Cooper v. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 4:35 am by Peter Mahler
By the same reasoning, the court also held excludable from the fixed-price formula the principal and interest payments made by the partners directly to the holder of the unit mortgage. [read post]