Search for: "State v. Lord"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 3,609
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2015, 2:34 am
Lords Sumption and Carnwath agreed. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 9:12 am
Lord v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 1:27 am
R (Chester) v Secretary of State for Justice, and McGeoch v Lord President of the Council & Anor, heard 10 – 11 June 2013. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 10:00 pm
R (on the application of S) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 2120 (Admin) - read judgment The High Court has found that the Secretary of State unlawfully detained a mentally ill foreign national who was awaiting deportation. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 3:33 am
Such forwarding would equate to copying the cuttings internally or externally for wider dissemination, which the House of Lords decided did require a separate licence in NLA v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 2:31 am
The unanimous judgment of the court was given by Lord Kerr. [read post]
8 Mar 2025, 11:16 pm
And finally…II This week, Robert Jenrick, MP for Newark and Shadow Lord Chancellor & Secretary of State for Justice, opined, “Above the Old Bailey sits a statue of Lady Justice. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 10:01 am
In October 2019, the House of Commons Justice Committee published its report “Court and Tribunal reforms“[5] on the modernization programme and stated: “Courts service modernization, including the use of better IT to be more efficient, is long overdue”. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 3:06 am
In general, the Secretary of State reviewed a whole life tariff after 25 years’ imprisonment. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 1:55 am
So, if you missed the action on this weblog, here is Round-up No 86: * Lord Justice Kitchin gleefully keeps us the right side up on "wrong way around" evidence in Fox trade mark appealEarlier this month, the Court of Appeal rejected an appeal and cross-appeal in the long running trade mark and passing off "Glee" dispute between Comic Enterprises and 20th Century Fox (Comic Enterprises Ltd v Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation [2016] EWCA Civ 41),… [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 10:21 am
The appeals On this occasion, the three cases, to be heard over the four days, are all Scottish appeals: Monday 12 June, 11am – 4pmSadovska and another v Secretary of State for the Home Department This appeal relates to the evidential burden on the state when disrupting ‘sham marriages’. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 4:19 pm
Secondly, it claims, in effect, that the Master of the Rolls’ private researches demonstrates the law, as stated in the leading text book, to be not only wrong but unarguable. [read post]
4 May 2019, 12:39 pm
See Hay v. [read post]
31 Aug 2008, 12:02 am
Government, with introductory note by Christina CernaHouse of Lords (on the Application of Al-Jedda) (FC) v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 4:01 pm
Last year, former Secretary of State for Justice Dominic Raab made changes to the Parole Board rules which prevented Prison and Probation staff from providing the Parole Board with recommendations regarding the release of imprisoned persons, However, it was held to be unlawful and reversed following its High Court challenge, R v Bailey. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 7:17 am
Lord Phillips MR, giving the judgment of the Court stated:- “We wish, however, to make some brief observations about [Lord Woolf CJ’s guidance in A v. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 1:47 am
Lord Justice Richards went on to state that this applied even where the belief was unreasonably held. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 3:10 am
Lord Carnwarth gave the only judgment, with which the other Justices agreed. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 3:52 am
Lord Neuberger, giving the dissenting judgment, stated that the Court’s approach when reviewing this decision should be similar to that of an appellate court reviewing a trial judge’s decision. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 3:34 am
Lord Reed stated on behalf of all the justices that the starting point for the contractual interpretation is the words the parties used in condition 11.9(a). [read post]
