Search for: "State v. Lyles" Results 1281 - 1300 of 1,491
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2011, 8:00 am by Kali Borkoski
 These grants are in addition to Friday’s orders (which Lyle covered last week), in which the Court agreed to review the constitutionality of three redistricting plans drawn up by a federal court for the Texas legislature and the state’s delegation to the U.S. [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:55 am by John Elwood
United States, 11-5683, and Hill v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 1:29 pm by Amy Howe
But if you want to multitask by getting some background on the substantive arguments before the Court while you listen, you could try the 2013 oral arguments in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
10 May 2016, 5:44 am by Amy Howe
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger criticizes a recent story in The Washington Post on the Court’s recent decision in Hurst v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
  Stephen Vaughan’s article discusses the Fifth Circuit’s Fisher v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 4:28 am by Edith Roberts
” In The Economist, Steven Mazie looks at Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 3:59 am by Amy Howe
Coverage of yesterday’s ruling in Puerto Rico v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 6:11 am by Lisa McElroy
For example, let’s start off with Milner v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 6:11 am by Rachel Sachs
Perry (the challenge to Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 3:24 am by Edith Roberts
United States and Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 10:03 am by Lyle Denniston
Lyle Denniston has been writing about the Supreme Court since 1958. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 5:09 am by Timothy P. Flynn
  The appellate judge suggested that perhaps the issue could be posed to the California Supreme Court for a determination as to whether California law would allow any entity to stand in as a legal “proxy” for the suit.Perry’s well-heeled lawyers stated in response to the suggestion that even if California law allowed a proxy-style legal fight, the proxy would be unable to demonstrate how they were harmed by lifting the ban against same-sex marriage.Scholars of the… [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:17 am by Nabiha Syed
” As part of this blog’s symposium on NFIB v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 8:48 am by Lyle Denniston
Legendary journalist Lyle Denniston has written for us as a contributor since June 2011 and has covered the Supreme Court since 1958. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:17 am by Nabiha Syed
” As part of this blog’s symposium on NFIB v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 2:54 pm by Kali Borkoski
Lyle recapped the oral argument here. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 3:41 pm
Finally, the Court will weigh a petition from the state of South Carolina — Stewart v. [read post]
8 May 2007, 9:02 am
Lyle Denniston has more on these cases here. [read post]