Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 19,778
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2011, 4:06 am
United States; Plessy v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 1:10 pm
In that context, the court found that the tweet could not reasonably be understood to state actual facts about Feld's mental state. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 3:13 am
The hearing on April 16th will be held at Georgia State University College of Law in Atlanta. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 9:40 am
United States, the crack v. powdered cocaine sentencing case. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
., Inc. v New York State Public Empl. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
., Inc. v New York State Public Empl. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 3:38 am
Nautica Apparel, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 1:29 pm
By: Jason Rantanen Fujitsu Ltd. v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 9:16 am
Rogers v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 11:14 am
For example, in Yellow Cab Co. of Sacramento v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 4:00 am
A mark must allow consumers to identify the commercial origin of goods and services, which consequently enables future buying decisions, following Sykes v OHIM, Case T‑130/01. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 5:59 am
Cir. 2003) (quoting Jacobs v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 3:57 am
Inc. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:14 am
Co. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 7:51 am
In United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 5:00 am
DaimlerChrysler v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 5:35 am
Judgment In this judgment, after setting out the background Tugendhat J considered submissions made as to his statement in his earlier judgment that “trial with a jury will generally be ordered as a matter of discretion, in particular where the state, or a public authority, is a defendant” [35] He accepted that, in the light of cases such as H v Ministry of Defence ([1991] QB 103) and Racz v Home Office ([1994] 2 AC 45) he should have omitted the word… [read post]
29 May 2006, 2:24 am
Department of Parks and Recreation v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 7:31 am
Here is the abstract: New York Times v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 10:48 am
Shizzle Pop, LLC v. [read post]
