Search for: "State v. Price" Results 1281 - 1300 of 13,223
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2015, 4:08 pm by Lax & Neville LLP
On May 18, 2015, The Supreme Court of the United States (“Supreme Court”) reversed the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals’ (“9th Circuit”) ruling in Tibble et al. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 9:19 am by Calvin Massey
  Perhaps that this is the price of free speech. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 8:22 am by Ronald Mann
The Fifth Circuit got its third consecutive unanimous reversal on Tuesday, when the Court decided its first class action case of the year, Mississippi v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 2:24 am
 In the decision of 9 July 2013 in BMS v Teva [2013] EWHC 1958, Mr Justice Birss assumed the role of the "remember when you..." parent in respect of Teva's launch plans. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 5:23 pm by Mike
(U.S. 1940) (so are price-fixing agreements); United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 12:42 pm by Josh Wright
§ 2 (2006), by willfully maintaining its monopoly power in the market for the sale of drugs for the treatment of PDA in the United States, and that Lundbeck’s conduct violated state law. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 8:32 am by Mike "No Man" Navarre
Here is a link to NMCCA’s latest and greatest En Banc opinion, United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 7:13 am by Eugene Volokh
United States (1908) and Indian trust doctrine under United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 2:36 pm by RiskProf
The insurers promised, after Hurricane Andrew, to bring stability in prices and availability if states (including Florida and Texas, where I was commissioner) gave them the three things they demanded: much higher rates based on models, sharp cuts in coverage, such as deductibles, and pools (like Citizens) where they could dump high risks and keep profitable risks for themselves. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 2:36 pm by RiskProf
The insurers promised, after Hurricane Andrew, to bring stability in prices and availability if states (including Florida and Texas, where I was commissioner) gave them the three things they demanded: much higher rates based on models, sharp cuts in coverage, such as deductibles, and pools (like Citizens) where they could dump high risks and keep profitable risks for themselves. [read post]