Search for: "State v. Rowe"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 3,523
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2015, 4:55 pm
The title of this post is the Oregon Secretary of State's description of the situation with that state's governor. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 11:37 am
However, two months later in State v. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 10:32 am
Penry v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 8:42 am
Lynaugh]”; (2) whether the state’s post-trial disclosure of evidence relating to ammunition used in the crime resulted in a violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments under Brady v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 7:14 am
Four death row inmates were plaintiffs, but one was just executed, leaving three more to carry the case forward. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 7:27 am
Yesterday the Court granted Oklahoma’s request to delay the executions of three death-row inmates; the Court had agreed to take on those inmates’ challenge to the state’s lethal-injection protocol last Friday. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 1:28 pm
Supreme Court gets stay-of-execution requests from death row inmates all the time. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 5:10 am
Presumably for these reasons, in the 13 years since we decided Penry v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 3:54 pm
In his latest plea to the Justices, he asked that the Court apply to his case a 2014 ruling, in the case of Hall v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 4:25 am
Other coverage of the Court focuses on the fall-out from the Court’s announcement last week that it would review a challenge by a group of Oklahoma death-row inmates to the state’s lethal-injection protocol — specifically, the state’s announcement yesterday that it would seek to delay the executions of three prisoners but at the same time keep open the possibility of resuming executions if it can establish a new lethal-injection protocol. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 9:29 am
The case (Glossip v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:56 am
Its announcement that it would review a challenge by a group of Oklahoma death-row inmates to the state’s lethal-injection protocol drew the most attention. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 10:30 pm
Friday afternoon, the Supreme Court announced that it would hear Glossip v. [read post]
24 Jan 2015, 6:43 am
The case, Glossip v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 1:23 pm
The Supreme Court agreed on Friday afternoon to hear the appeal of three Oklahoma death-row inmates who are challenging the three-drug protocol the state now uses for executions. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:56 pm
USA, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 11:15 am
Lynaugh]”; (2) whether the state’s post-trial disclosure of evidence relating to ammunition used in the crime resulted in a violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments under Brady v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 8:40 am
King v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 11:42 am
" Kremer v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 2:46 am
Roper, leaving the door open for a death-row inmate to pursue federal habeas relief after his lawyers missed a deadline. [read post]
