Search for: "State v. Settle" Results 1281 - 1300 of 15,619
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2014, 3:44 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang LLP
    [1] International Energy Group Limited v Zurich Insurance plc UK [2012] EWHC 69 (Comm) [2] Barker v Corus UK Ltd [2006] UKHL 20 [3] International Energy Group Ltd v Zurich Insurance plc UK [2013] EWCA Civ 39 [4] BAI (Run off) Ltd (In Scheme of Arrangement) and others v Durham and others [2012] 1 WLR 867 [5] Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd [2002] UKHL 22 The post Case Preview: International Energy Group Ltd v Zurich… [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:51 pm
The judgment merely states thatcat conceptually confused “it is sufficient to recall that, according to settled case-law, the repute of a trade mark is relevant, in assessing the likelihood of confusion, only as regards the repute of the earlier mark”, citing Gitana v OHIM — Teddy (GITANA), T‑569/11 (2013) (para 98). [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 11:51 am by Curt Cutting
  The Washington Supreme Court's contrary holding is a bit surprising, given that the plaintiffs in State Farm v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 8:45 am
Moreover, the United States notes, the Fourth Circuit’s interpretation may have a variety of adverse effects, such as “prevent[ing] employers from settling claims with finality and employees from obtaining payments through such settlements without the inevitable delay of seeking court or DOL approval. [read post]
14 May 2025, 5:31 pm by David Klein
After nearly four years of litigation, including a trip to the United States Supreme Court, Plaintiffs accepted $2.25 million dollars to settle their crypto sweepstakes lawsuit. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 12:21 am by Herskovits, PLLC
Lincoln Financial Securities Corp. recently settled with FINRA concerning supervisory deficiencies over a now-deceased rep (Kenneth Wayne McLeod) who purportedly ran a Ponzi scheme targeting retired government employees (Department of Enforcement v. [read post]
District Court for the District of Oregon granted class certification in Whaley et al. v. [read post]