Search for: "State v. Syed"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 1,330
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2024, 10:55 am
In U.S. ex rel Adventist Health Sys., et al. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2024, 11:11 am
Inc. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 1:57 pm
Cheney v. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 7:57 pm
Kumar, R. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 12:44 pm
The reasoning of these decisions varied at times, but the theme was consistent and widely understood that "a series of steps for conducting business could not be patented" (at pages 26-27 of his decision Justice Stevens cited several such cases including US Credit Sys Co v American Credit Indem Co (1893), Hotel Security Checking Co v Lorraine Co (1908), Loew's Drive-In Theatres, Inc v Park-In Theatres, Inc (1949)). [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 6:51 pm
They also state that Mr. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 7:53 am
Corp. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2024, 4:58 am
” Feenix Payment Sys, LLC v Blum (2022): Defendant asserted the absolute privilege to defamation and contract-based claims based on allegedly defamatory statements in his pre-litigation letter. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 1:26 pm
In contrast to the United States, treble (or multiple) damages are not available. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 10:40 pm
In Burgess v. [read post]
4 Feb 2025, 6:03 am
See Yelling v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 8:35 pm
See Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 9:48 pm
Mountain States Mutual Casualty Co. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 2:59 pm
., Sarafin v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:43 pm
Sys. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 4:35 am
Under the former, in Glenn v Hoteltron Sys., Inc. (74 NY2d 386 [1989]), New York’s highest court held that a fee award to a successful derivate plaintiff is a liability of the entity on behalf of whom the plaintiff sued, not the defendant(s) the plaintiff actually sued. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:57 am
., DCG Sys., Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 5:54 am
Sys., as discussed here, in order to take up the question. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 7:03 am
Board of Regents of the Univ. of Houston Sys. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 1:07 pm
Bennett's employment and there was no evidence showing that the stated reason for termination was "pretextual," or rather that the termination was motivated by discrimination. [read post]
